Teams

Rubben/18/8.5/WCN/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 8.5 Shrev

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-08vs Haren/18/8.5/WCN/QTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTherina Steenkamp / Rhonda Rubben vs Keri Fidelak / Marcia Alcantara6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShelly Valiulis / Jennifer Sutton vs Stacy Haren / Grace Rogers6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Haren/18/8.5/WCN/QTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesTammy Cannon / Brandy Hayse vs Marcia Alcantara / Leslie Stewart3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDonna McGee / Shelly Valiulis vs Carla Hildebrand / Lucy Young6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRebekah Anzalone / Kristen Bernard vs Laura Hogg / Keri Fidelak7-5, 7-5
2025-09-25vs Haren/18/8.5/WCN/QTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Bickham / Kristen Bernard vs Lucy Young / Madeline Brown2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarta Sramkova / Rhonda Rubben vs Grace Rogers / Marcia Alcantara6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRebekah Anzalone / Brandy Hayse vs Stacy Haren / Lori Yokem6-3, 6-1
2025-09-02vs Haren/18/8.5/WCN/QTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Bickham / Jennifer Sutton vs Stacy Haren / Leslie Stewart4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTammy Cannon / Tracy Elliott vs Marcia Alcantara / Keri Fidelak6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDonna McGee / Shelly Valiulis vs Madeline Brown / Grace Rogers5-7, 4-6
2025-08-26vs Haren/18/8.5/WCN/QTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebekah Anzalone / Shelly Valiulis vs Grace Rogers / Carla Hildebrand6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTammy Cannon / Tracy Elliott vs Stacy Haren / Lucy Young6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Bickham / Kristen Bernard vs Marcia Alcantara / Keri Fidelak1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Carolyn Bickham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Donna McGee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.02
Tammy Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Rebekah Anzalone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.99
Brandy Hayse
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Tracy Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Jennifer Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Kristen Bernard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Lynn Ferry-Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Rhonda Rubben
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marta Sramkova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shelly Valiulis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Therina Steenkamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Rubben + Lynn Ferry-Nelson6553% games−3.0% vs expected
Donna McGee + Rebekah Anzalone4157% games−5.5% vs expected
Rhonda Rubben + Therina Steenkamp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolyn Bickham
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Donna McGee
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Tammy Cannon
20W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Rebekah Anzalone
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Brandy Hayse
44W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Tracy Elliott
41W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Jennifer Sutton
25W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Kristen Bernard
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Lynn Ferry-Nelson
57W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Rhonda Rubben
45W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Marta Sramkova
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Valiulis
27W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Therina Steenkamp
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.