Teams

Lifetime Miller

2026 OH OV SUMMER Career A55&O W Cincinnati · 2026 Summer Career A 55&O 9.0W Cincinnati

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-02vs Lifetime KushonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudy Dennis / Jennifer Kapszukiewicz vs Patricia Rouchon-Wells / Miho Morris4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Whitman / Wendy Weil vs Laurel Fritzhand / Pamela Wise6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-26vs Lifetime KushonLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanet Scruby / Judy Dennis vs Yasemin Kaya Congleton / Namchi Le2-6, 6-7
2026-05-15vs Lifetime KushonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesWendy Weil / Judy Dennis vs Laurel Fritzhand / Namchi Le6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Whitman / Jennifer Kapszukiewicz vs Kelly Cox-Donson / Miho Morris2-6, 2-6
2026-05-12vs Lifetime KushonLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Weil / Bonnie Lang vs Gillian Oakenfull / Beth Kushon4-6, 3-6
2026-05-05vs Lifetime KushonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynda Baumann / Wendy Weil vs Kelly Cox-Donson / Pamela Wise1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 Summer Career A 55&O 9.0W Cincinnati
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime Kushon60171391
2Lifetime Miller0611735214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Sharon Barns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Donna Griffor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.82
Judy Dennis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Lynda Baumann
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Bonnie Lang
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Janet Scruby
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.62
Felicia Bourbon
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Sharon Palatchi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jeanne Miller
published
Jennifer Kapszukiewicz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Whitman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Weil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Scruby + Felicia Bourbon5260% games+7.3% vs expected
Jeanne Miller + Felicia Bourbon7454% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Weil + Lynda Baumann1537% gamesnot enough data
Jeanne Miller + Wendy Weil044 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Miller + Lynda Baumann314 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Lang + Donna Griffor314 matchesnot enough data
Judy Dennis + Wendy Weil123 matchesnot enough data
Felicia Bourbon + Bonnie Lang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Barns
41W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.94
Donna Griffor
31W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Judy Dennis
37W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Lynda Baumann
17W–43L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Bonnie Lang
23W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Janet Scruby
56W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Felicia Bourbon
60W–50L career · 9 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.62
Sharon Palatchi
4W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
Jeanne Miller
34W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Kapszukiewicz
17W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Whitman
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Weil
8W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.