Teams

Nagel

Combo · Combo 7.5M

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-25vs DiazLost 02
L#1 DoublesDustin Hayden / Chase Bruton vs Jose Reyes / Matthew Counts3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEric Nagel / Brent Wilcox Sr vs David Reyes / Nicolas Diaz1-6, 1-6
2026-08-18vs MayerWon 21
W#1 DoublesChase Bruton / Beau Theimer vs Binh Vu / George Wallace6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJim Honea / Dustin Hayden vs Jared Urbantke / Asher Rogers6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBrent Wilcox Sr / Cecil Ross vs Sol Mayer / Brady Wetz3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-13vs NallyLost 12
L#1 DoublesCecil Ross / Beau Theimer vs Kent Nally / Jon Cauthorn2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Barnes / Chase Bruton vs Kaleb Nance / Reggie Aguilar6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDustin Hayden / Jim Honea vs Gunnar Stroud / Jacob Halsell6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-04vs DiazWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Honea / Ryan Barnes vs Nicolas Diaz / Matthew Counts3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChase Bruton / Eric Nagel vs Dustin Haire / Edward Welch4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrent Wilcox Sr / Cecil Ross vs Jacob Maenius / Damon Scott Cotton2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Combo 7.5M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Diaz2163762
2Nally21541068
3Nagel1133858
4Mayer02151068

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Chase Bruton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Ryan Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Jim Honea
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Scott Gibbs
published
3.52
Beau Theimer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Dustin Hayden
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Eric Nagel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Cecil Ross
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Barnes + Dustin Hayden8555% games−3.3% vs expected
Scott Gibbs + Cecil Ross6554% gamesnot enough data
Eric Nagel + Dustin Hayden134 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Barnes + Beau Theimer224 matchesnot enough data
Chase Bruton + Ryan Barnes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chase Bruton
37W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Ryan Barnes
33W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Jim Honea
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Scott Gibbs
84W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Beau Theimer
41W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Dustin Hayden
35W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Eric Nagel
37W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cecil Ross
48W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.