Teams

Ka.Wakeford40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-10-04vs Ki.Monsees40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Beth Rives vs Jeanie White / Liz Woodall6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTara LeFevre / Emily Hancock vs Meghan Yancey / Kari Knoblauch3-6, 3-6
2023-09-27vs Je.Wolborsky40C6.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesMartha Funsten / DEBRA LAUGHERY vs Evelyn Andino / Ngoc Tran3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Celia Whited vs Cornelia Shaw / Wendy Sielaty6-2, 6-1
2023-09-20vs Ch.Burr40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesTara LeFevre / Karen Wakeford vs Heather Roberts / Julie Liddle4-6, 5-7
2023-09-13vs Al.Uthe40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCara Kuremsky / Celia Whited vs Allison Sheehan / Ramsay Younger6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTara LeFevre / Karen Wakeford vs Parker Wright / Terry Jones6-3, 6-3
2023-09-06vs Ki.Johnson40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesKellie Chesson / Celia Whited vs Tobi Buckley / Karen Foster7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTara LeFevre / Emily Hancock vs Tammy Kozacko / Cecilia Edgar6-2, 6-1
2023-08-30vs Ki.Monsees40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Celia Whited vs Meghan Yancey / Melissa Graham4-6, 2-6
2023-08-23vs Je.Wolborsky40C6.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Celia Whited vs Evelyn Andino / Paige Alford6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTara LeFevre / Emily Hancock vs Julie Brigham / Wendy Sielaty6-2, 6-1
2023-08-16vs Ch.Burr40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Beth Rives vs Julie Liddle / Takako Schenberger6-2, 7-6
2023-08-09vs Al.Uthe40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Celia Whited vs Allison Sheehan / Alison Uthe6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKellie Chesson / Kathy Saieed vs Terry Jones / Shade Maret6-7, 2-6
2023-08-02vs Ki.Johnson40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Celia Whited vs Tammy Kozacko / Phyllis Soltz6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTara LeFevre / Emily Hancock vs Kim Johnson / Karen Foster6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Deb Lanier
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.32
Beth Rives
published 3.5
Celia Whited
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.15
Cara Kuremsky
published 3.5
3.14
Tara LeFevre
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.07
Kellie Chesson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Karen Wakeford
published
2.46
DEBRA LAUGHERY
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara LeFevre + Deb Lanier14559% gamesnot enough data
Celia Whited + Kellie Chesson7356% gamesnot enough data
Deb Lanier + Celia Whited4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deb Lanier
488W–223L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Beth Rives
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Celia Whited
79W–80L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cara Kuremsky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Tara LeFevre
199W–175L career · 8 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Kellie Chesson
107W–119L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Karen Wakeford
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
DEBRA LAUGHERY
48W–92L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.