Teams

Southern Recreation Center - Smiechewicz

2025 Volusia Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-15vs Volusia/Manning/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Gardner / Rhonda Smiechewicz vs Margie Bailey / Jodi Manning4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-08vs Plantation Bay CCLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Sugrue / Nancy Gardner vs Leslie Ramshaw / Katy Rachman6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-22vs Volusia/Manning/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Gardner / Jorika Steyn vs Jodi Manning / Diane Castelli6-4, 6-0
2025-02-15vs Plantation Bay CCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy Malave / Mary Sugrue vs Kristi Rice / Katy Rachman7-5, 3-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Gardner / Rhonda Smiechewicz vs Holly Kotoski / Julie Seraphin6-2, 6-0
2025-02-01vs Volusia/Manning/55&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Gardner / Jorika Steyn vs Tracy McKenna / Tracie Thomas4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Harple / Amy Malave vs Sirikit Press / Kristen Okarski1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-01-25vs Plantation Bay CCWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Gardner / Jorika Steyn vs Katy Rachman / Kristi Rice3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Deborah Nicklaus
published 4.5
3.77
Amy Malave
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Rhonda Smiechewicz
published
3.10
Candace Newman
published 3.5
Donna Otto
published
Jorika Steyn
published
Mary Sugrue
published
Michelle Chalmers
published
Nancy Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Newman + Deborah Nicklaus303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deborah Nicklaus
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
4
Amy Malave
50W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Rhonda Smiechewicz
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Candace Newman
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
Donna Otto
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jorika Steyn
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Sugrue
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Chalmers
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Gardner
25W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.