Teams

SFV - Passing Shots

2023 Adult 65+ SFV Spring · SFV 65+ WeekDay - 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-12vs SFV LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMiki Lorentz / Janice Miller vs Christine Sauceda / Stephanie Pu4-6, 6-7
2023-06-08vs SFV LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanice Miller / Diane Audeon vs Sandy Robinson / Ade Quingco6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-01vs SFV LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanice Miller / Diane Audeon vs Rhonda Stone / Ade Quingco6-2, 6-3
2023-05-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesMiki Lorentz / Ana Schwartz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-05vs SFV LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoLost 01
L#3 DoublesMiki Lorentz / Janice Miller vs Caprina Auyong / Pat Guttormsen3-6, 4-6
2023-04-24vs SFV LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoanne Carlsen / Miki Lorentz vs Pat Guttormsen / Caprina Auyong6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 65+ WeekDay - 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Susan Friedman
published
3.00
Marion Tumen
published
2.94
Diane Audeon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Connie Benveniste
published 3.5
2.84
Susan Schechter
published
2.78
Joanne Carlsen
published
2.76
Miki Lorentz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Felice Densa
published 3
2.69
Ana Schwartz
published 3
2.62
Fran Prange
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Benveniste + Joanne Carlsen0518% games−16.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Marion Tumen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.00
3
Diane Audeon
48W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3.5
Connie Benveniste
2W–21L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
Susan Schechter
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.84
Joanne Carlsen
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Miki Lorentz
84W–98L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Felice Densa
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ana Schwartz
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Fran Prange
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.