Teams

Monmouth Swingers

2025 18&Over Mixed · 9.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-13vs Wild CardsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYoonhee Kang / Chih Chang vs Lauren Olsen / ILAN GAMBURG5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVladimir Bojcev / Kallie Speller vs Zachary Tanenbaum / Alana Wyatt2-6, 4-6
2025-04-06vs Wild CardsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Olman / Vladimir Bojcev vs Alana Wyatt / ILAN GAMBURG6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Topazio / Katherine Torbov vs Kristen Bocina / Safie Moamen3-6, 3-6
2025-03-30vs Wild CardsWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Goldberg / Yoonhee Kang vs Lauren Olsen / Don Kim6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesArik Zeevy / Laura Wunderlich vs Sharen Resnikoff / Jordan Cruz6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Topazio / Elise Gerdes vs AUSTIN KIM / Alana Wyatt4-6, 5-7
2025-03-24vs Wild CardsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRaymond Matthieu Postadan / Jill Olman vs Kristen Bocina / David Przystasz2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesArik Zeevy / Laura Wunderlich vs Renee Lee / Zachary Tanenbaum4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElise Gerdes / John Kudrle vs Casey Schnabel / Edina Jung4-6, 4-6
2025-03-09vs Wild CardsLost 12
W#1 DoublesArik Zeevy / Laura Wunderlich vs Marie Protopopova / David Przystasz6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesVladimir Bojcev / Agatha Malinowski vs Renee Lee / Zachary Tanenbaum1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMiell Yi / Patrick Liu vs Jordan Cruz / Sharen Resnikoff6-7, 4-6
2025-03-02vs Wild CardsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick Liu / Miell Yi vs Brittney Eady / David Przystasz6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesYoonhee Kang / Chih Chang vs Edina Jung / Casey Schnabel4-6, 5-7
2025-02-23vs Wild CardsLost 12
W#1 DoublesArik Zeevy / Miell Yi vs Marie Protopopova / Don Kim6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesYoonhee Kang / Mostafa Moamen vs Kristen Bocina / Safie Moamen2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTravis Sandman / Laura Wunderlich vs Brittney Eady / David Przystasz1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Arik Zeevy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.50
Travis Sandman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.48
Jill Olman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.40
Elise Gerdes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Kallie Speller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Raymond Matthieu Postadan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Chih Chang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.07
Miell Yi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Yoonhee Kang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Samir Shah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Vladimir Bojcev
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.87
John Kudrle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Topazio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Agatha Malinowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Goldberg
published
Mostafa Moamen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Liu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sergio Jimenez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miell Yi + John Kudrle3550% games−7.2% vs expected
Kallie Speller + John Kudrle4260% gamesnot enough data
Miell Yi + Patrick Liu033 matchesnot enough data
Elise Gerdes + John Kudrle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Arik Zeevy
7W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Sandman
10W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.50
Jill Olman
27W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
4.48
4.5
Elise Gerdes
120W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
Kallie Speller
31W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Raymond Matthieu Postadan
71W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Chih Chang
96W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
Miell Yi
105W–96L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Yoonhee Kang
65W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
Samir Shah
75W–69L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Vladimir Bojcev
44W–66L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
John Kudrle
132W–82L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Andrew Topazio
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Agatha Malinowski
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Eric Goldberg
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mostafa Moamen
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Liu
25W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sergio Jimenez
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.