Teams

CCC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-30vs KC-RH REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDrew Damiano / Chris Wiley vs Michael Hursta / Mathew GILBERT2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJared Hamilton / RC Myles vs Sean Kavanaugh / Andy Roemersberger6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndy Hancock / RC Myles vs Gerald Russell / Charles Parsons6-3, 7-5
2023-05-16vs BM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesDrew Damiano / Brett Nathan vs Ian Campbell / Todd Fenton5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-09vs PH GOLDWon 20
W#2 DoublesRC Myles / Andy Hancock vs Shawn Fischer / Jason Utsler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDrew Damiano vs Nick Politano6-3, 7-5
2023-05-04vs BCST REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJared Hamilton / Andy Hancock vs Curtis Preston / Daryl Mussell6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDrew Damiano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-02vs GR REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJared Hamilton / RC Myles vs Brett Linscott / Jason Linscott6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Drew Damiano
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Sean Crowley
published
3.59
Greg Sutton
published
3.34
Tyler Jaccaud
published
3.26
Andy Hancock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brett Nathan
published 3.5
3.23
Stefan Wenger
published
3.23
Chris Wiley
published 3.5
3.23
RC Myles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Burt Katubig
published 3.5
3.11
Jared Hamilton
published
3.09
Jon Piper
published
Jonathan Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jared Hamilton + Andy Hancock3257% games+12.3% vs expected
Andy Hancock + RC Myles11555% games+5.1% vs expected
Jared Hamilton + Burt Katubig4247% games−5.6% vs expected
Drew Damiano + Greg Sutton314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Drew Damiano
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Sean Crowley
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Greg Sutton
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Tyler Jaccaud
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Andy Hancock
32W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Brett Nathan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stefan Wenger
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chris Wiley
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
RC Myles
42W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Burt Katubig
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Jared Hamilton
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jon Piper
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
Jonathan Moore
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.