← Teams

PT&E/SJRC-Floyd/Frankel

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.28 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Vivek Mano
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Chase Doudican
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
John Boelling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Kieu Lam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.06
David Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.05
Ralf Bednarz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Debbie Frankel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Nicole Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-12-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKieu Lam / Vivek Mano vs Yuxia Ouyang / Xiaolin Nan6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Paul Kim vs Jing Li / Yongping Liu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Floyd / Nicole Floyd vs Lamone Voravongseng / Qin Lian6-1, 6-3
2024-11-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKieu Lam / Vivek Mano vs Nolan Astrab / Catherine Hu6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Ralf Bednarz vs Kevin Hughes / Wen-Li Jao6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Paul Kim vs Anna Reutin / Danny Tran6-2, 7-5
2024-11-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKieu Lam / John Boelling vs Omar Martinez / Kelly Norling6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRalf Bednarz / Rebecca Griffith vs David Bean / Blythe Knott6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDebbie Frankel / Paul Kim vs Steve Harris / Bridget Kaiel7-6, 7-5
2024-11-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKieu Lam / John Boelling vs Edmundo Arroyo / Michelle Vo6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChase Doudican / Nicole Floyd vs Peter Looi / Jane Shu6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Floyd / Debbie Frankel vs Hien Lu / Lani Chu4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-26Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesChase Doudican / Rebecca Griffith vs Heike Droste / Gareth Harries6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVivek Mano / Debbie Frankel vs Kristi Vargas / Andrew Petersen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Boelling / Heidi Kjos vs Dayna Jahnke-Corwin / Tony Moreno6-3, 7-5
2024-10-13Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKieu Lam / Vivek Mano vs Miriam Habafy / John Kin6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Floyd / Debbie Frankel vs Parish Burns / Michael Koch6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNicole Floyd / Ralf Bednarz vs Reiko Maeda / Matthew Kanagandram6-3, 6-0
2024-10-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Chase Doudican vs Parish Burns / Andrew Scheirer6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebbie Frankel / Paul Kim vs Amy Ouellette / Gavin Newcomer6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Floyd / David Floyd vs Miriam Habafy / John Kin6-2, 6-1
2024-09-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Vivek Mano vs Emily Shue / Greg Marx5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicole Floyd / John Boelling vs Terry Bennett / Carrie Willis6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRalf Bednarz / Debbie Frankel vs Adriana McCord / Jody McCord6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Vivek Mano
36W–21L career
0%86%14%
3.46
3.5
Chase Doudican
45W–28L career
not enough data
—
3.5
John Boelling
44W–51L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kieu Lam
45W–70L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3
David Floyd
56W–37L career · type A
0%64%36%
3.06
3
Ralf Bednarz
69W–43L career
0%68%32%
3.05
3
Debbie Frankel
24W–58L career
not enough data
—
3
Nicole Floyd
35W–56L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.