Teams

Huguenot - Nixon

2023 Duval Adult 65 & Over - Women - Winter · 7.0 Women--Winter League

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-27vs Florida/Cohen/65&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Sanborn / Rebecca Smith vs Martha Poitevent / Laurie Sage0-6, 6-7
2023-03-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Sanborn / Rebecca Smith vs Patricia Clifford / Polly Bigalow6-3, 6-1
2023-03-06vs Deercreek - JoyceWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Smith / JUDITH DEVRIES vs Hyacinth Bohlinger / Jyothi Berman6-1, 6-3
2023-02-27vs Florida/Cohen/65&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Smith / Lois Robichaud vs Martha Poitevent / Laurie Sage1-6, 6-7
2023-02-13vs Kraft - RaganLost 01
L#1 DoublesJUDITH DEVRIES / Rebecca Smith vs Joyce Menz / Liz McCall6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-06vs Deercreek - JoyceLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Smith / JUDITH DEVRIES vs Robin Braddock / Linda Montgomery6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-30vs Florida/Cohen/65&Over7.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Smith / JUDITH DEVRIES vs Donna Erenberg / Tara Galaydick6-3, 6-4
2023-01-23vs Kraft - RaganLost 01
L#1 DoublesJUDITH DEVRIES / Rebecca Smith vs Joyce Menz / Liz McCall1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women--Winter League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Lois Robichaud
published
3.07
Cherie Johnson
published 3.5
3.04
Judith Daniel
published
2.98
Connie Rouls
published 3.5
2.88
Teresa Westerman
published
JUDITH DEVRIES
published
Katherine Sanborn
published
Rebecca Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JUDITH DEVRIES + Cherie Johnson4159% gamesnot enough data
Connie Rouls + Lois Robichaud033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lois Robichaud
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Cherie Johnson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Judith Daniel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Connie Rouls
1W–14L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Teresa Westerman
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
JUDITH DEVRIES
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Sanborn
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Smith
26W–36L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.