Teams

Hills/Wilson/55&Over8.0W

2025 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-29vs Florida/Wissel/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Catherine Myers vs Melany Jablonski / Lynn O'Brien6-2, 6-4
2025-03-22vs RiverHills - T. ManangelloWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Karen Abrams vs Kerri Fritsch / Teresa Manganello2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Apollo Beach - K. BryanWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Catherine Myers vs Kathleen Rossman / Kristie Bryan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-22vs Florida/Wissel/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Evangelista / Melissa Gerardi vs Elizabeth Burdick / Tish Wissel2-6, 5-7
2025-02-22vs HCC - D. JacksonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Stephanie Wilson vs Lisa Durkin / Edna Carlin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-15vs RiverHills - T. ManangelloWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatie Healy / Leticia Leppert vs Melanie Skinner / Brigitte Paola6-1, 6-0
2025-02-02vs Apollo Beach - K. BryanWon 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Myers / Leticia Leppert vs Mary Alice Hillier / Kathleen Rossman6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Katie Healy
published
3.93
Linda Bacon
published
3.92
Becky Ogburn
published 4
3.92
Rebecca Evangelista
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Leticia Leppert
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Laura Wetzel
published
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
3.72
Kelly Armagost
published
3.71
Cheryl Pawlowski
published 4
3.61
Karen Abrams
published
3.53
Nancy van Winter
published
3.37
Melissa Gerardi
published
3.18
Stephanie Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Wetzel + Cheryl Pawlowski10454% games−2.8% vs expected
Becky Ogburn + Stephanie Wilson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Healy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Linda Bacon
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Becky Ogburn
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Rebecca Evangelista
113W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Leticia Leppert
211W–99L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Laura Wetzel
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Cheryl Pawlowski
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Karen Abrams
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Nancy van Winter
69W–70L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Melissa Gerardi
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
Stephanie Wilson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.