Teams

CENTRAL PK SM CM9.5A

2022 COMBO · Men 9.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.79 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Dulac / Brian Heimbecker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-23vs RINCONADA PK CM9.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Ngo / Brian Heimbecker vs Gabino Sanz / Atsushi Shirai6-1, 6-1
2022-09-17vs MILLBRAE RC CM9.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Dulac / Brian Heimbecker vs Ryan Stark / Donny Su3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Geoff Mora
published 5
4.74
Ryan Sablan
published
4.58
Andrew Ngo
published 5
4.57
Garrett Chun
published 5
4.56
Joshua Kaye
published
4.44
Roshan Vasudev
published
4.44
Brian Higashi
published 4.5
4.41
Benjamin Butin
published 4.5
4.30
Brian Heimbecker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.27
Eric Contreras
published 4.5
4.26
Roman Olmos
published
4.18
Shawn Robinson
published
4.03
Ken Marques
published
Ole Hoefelmann
published
Rick Kepler
published
William Tierney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Marques + Andrew Ngo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Geoff Mora
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Sablan
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.74
5
Andrew Ngo
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.58
5
Garrett Chun
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.57
Joshua Kaye
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.56
Roshan Vasudev
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
4.44
4.5
Brian Higashi
8W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
4.44
4.5
Benjamin Butin
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
4.30
4.5
Eric Contreras
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Roman Olmos
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
Shawn Robinson
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Ken Marques
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
4.03
Ole Hoefelmann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Kepler
21W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Tierney
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.