Teams

PRKR ORANGE

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-07vs GAC GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Brudigan / Sarah Schmitz vs Megan Whelan / Kay Christensen3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKari Graham vs Brooke Wagner1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Backus / Stella Madrid vs Alison Wheeler / Sarah Mervak7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-29vs PRC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesKari Graham / Debbie Sabato vs Sharon Kisch / Erika Pope3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Brudigan vs Sherri Bliss1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShawna Allen / Kate Pulliam vs Sarah Hughes / Amber Harris3-6, 5-7
2023-04-15vs LTFC BLUELost 02
L#1 SinglesMichelle Brudigan vs Alena Sukhovetskyy3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Schmitz / Stella Madrid vs Rebecca McIlwaine / Janet Hill1-6, 0-6
2023-04-01vs CCV REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStella Madrid / Kari Graham vs Kristin Chapman / Beth Hoffman1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShawna Allen / Kate Pulliam vs Liz Shepard / Jean Duggan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Michelle Brudigan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Shawna Allen
published
2.69
Kari Graham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.61
Sarah Schmitz
published
2.56
Debbie Sabato
published 3
2.48
Stella Madrid
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Kate Pulliam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lara Mannix
published
Linda Backus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Pulliam + Shawna Allen2645% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Michelle Brudigan
47W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Shawna Allen
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Kari Graham
95W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Sarah Schmitz
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Debbie Sabato
8W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Stella Madrid
61W–80L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Kate Pulliam
94W–67L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.40
Lara Mannix
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Backus
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.