Teams

FREMONT TC CW6.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-28vs WALLENBERG PK CW6.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesGigi Harvey / Melissa Vuckovich vs Jieying Shi / Xuan Wei4-6, 0-6
2025-10-22vs CASTLEWOOD CC CW6.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesElla Hurd / Julie Johnson vs Ashley West / Stephanie Wendell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Kitagawa / Cindy Motamedi vs Lorna Smith / Anna Barletta1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesChristine Fronczak / Melissa Vuckovich vs Hui Chen / Donna Barpal Lew6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-17vs DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS CW6.5AWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Kitagawa / Renisa Satrijo vs Michelle Cooke / Michelle Weiss7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElla Hurd / Yuhong Huang vs Traci Rebiejo / Melissa Bach6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Fronczak / Debby Heicklen vs Yulia Costello / Barbara Harris6-1, 6-2
2025-10-16vs BLACKHAWK CC CW6.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesElla Hurd / Julie Johnson vs Angela Beck / Maurine Hagan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Kitagawa / Cindy Motamedi vs Erin Smith / Rachelle Ricketts1-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Fronczak / Renisa Satrijo vs Odette Kardek / Michelle Saunders6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesRenisa Satrijo / Dongmei Cao vs Leticia Lafosse / Paule Kodjou5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-20vs CROW CANYON CC CW6.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesElla Hurd / Debby Heicklen vs Debbie Baker / Romeda Arsanjani6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRose Keogh / Renisa Satrijo vs Lea McSweeney / Lisa Henderson5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Pizzo / Melissa Vuckovich vs Dana Kruger / Kay Warneke6-2, 6-3
2025-09-14vs STONEBRAE CC CW6.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesElla Hurd / Cindy Motamedi vs Minh Cannon / Amanda Sawit6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRose Keogh / Melissa Vuckovich vs Jazelle Nono / Veranica Hasan1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Fronczak / Debby Heicklen vs Divya Bala / Shruthi Reddy6-1, 6-0
2025-09-13vs BAY CLUB PL CW6.5BLost 12
W#1 DoublesElla Hurd / Julie Johnson vs Joni Mahoney / Flora Li6-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Pizzo / Sangeetha Narasimhan vs Tina Zhao / Lihong Chao5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRose Keogh / Yuhong Huang vs Qimin Cao / Lydia Liu1-6, 2-6
2025-08-26vs DIABLO CC CW6.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesElla Hurd / Julie Johnson vs Leslie Wuischpard / Heidi Corkern7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRose Keogh / Sangeetha Narasimhan vs Dana Brent / Nancy Daetz5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Fronczak / Debby Heicklen vs Erika Woolley / Lindsay Walker7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Ella Hurd
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.33
Christine Fronczak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Debby Heicklen
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.27
Rose Keogh
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.23
Rita Kerwin
published
3.16
Karen Kitagawa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Julie Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Renisa Satrijo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Melissa Vuckovich
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Yuhong Huang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Nancy Pizzo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Sangeetha Narasimhan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Cindy Motamedi
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Keogh + Ella Hurd6168% games+6.8% vs expected
Julie Johnson + Ella Hurd404 matchesnot enough data
Christine Fronczak + Debby Heicklen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ella Hurd
47W–14L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Christine Fronczak
50W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Debby Heicklen
21W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Rose Keogh
33W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Rita Kerwin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Karen Kitagawa
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
Julie Johnson
28W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Renisa Satrijo
8W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Melissa Vuckovich
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Yuhong Huang
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Nancy Pizzo
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.82
Sangeetha Narasimhan
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Cindy Motamedi
13W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.