Teams

OC Singles Sistahs -Fullerton TC - Lori Sat10am

OC Fall Team Singles · OC 4.0W

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Heather Sepulveda6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAzin Mirchi vs Heather Sepulveda1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLana Dalley vs Cathy Xing2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Lorri Watson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-08vs OC Team Courage - Nisha - Sun9Split 11
W#1 SinglesLana Dalley vs Enam Bakr4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAnnette Tran vs Alicia Carlin1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Jazmin Rubio6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAzin Mirchi vs Sofia Ochoa6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAnnette Tran vs Kayla Friedland1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesGladys Tan vs Megan Osborn3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNicole Festini vs Lorri Watson6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesGladys Tan vs Gia Bao Le0-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesSabrina Wedge vs Trisha Coy0-6, 3-6
2025-09-27vs OC Team Courage - Nisha - Sun9Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAzin Mirchi vs Enam Bakr7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesGladys Tan vs Daniela Schardinger1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSabrina Wedge vs Alicia Carlin1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Lana Dalley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.53
Lori Mahoney Jones
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.51
Athena Wong
published 4
3.49
Azin Mirchi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.47
Nicole Festini
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Gladys Tan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.11
Annette Tran
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Sabrina Wedge
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Rebecca Ginsburg
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lana Dalley
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Lori Mahoney Jones
81W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Athena Wong
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Azin Mirchi
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Nicole Festini
22W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Gladys Tan
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Annette Tran
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Sabrina Wedge
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Rebecca Ginsburg
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.