Teams

CP-Space Cowboys-Che

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Jason Liang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Daniel Warren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Eric Baird
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2023-03-19Split 11
L#2 DoublesDaniel Warren / Jim Muenz vs Mark Martin / Philip Rezek2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPhillip Lu / Jason Liang vs Brad Struss / Eric Fredricksen6-2, 6-2
2023-03-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesJason Liang / Phillip Lu vs Chase Costello / Matthew Klutznick6-2, 6-2
2023-03-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEric Baird / Kaushik Purohit vs Jason Buchanan / Jason Franklin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-02-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesJason Liang / Jim Muenz vs Stefko Kostadinov / Michael Best6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesPhillip Lu / Eric Baird vs Kelly Bryant / DAVID MATYAS2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-01-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJustin Marquart / Daniel Warren vs Kevin McMahan / Douglas Gordon6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jason Liang
90W–72L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.20
3
Daniel Warren
79W–79L career
0%61%39%
3.08
3
Eric Baird
72W–53L career · type A
0%85%15%
2.98

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.