Teams

LATA55/Barber/LCTC

2024 Fall 55 & Over - LATA · Fall Adult Women - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Fall Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Pamela Faile
published
3.25
Rita Squires
published
3.24
Denise Holmes
published 3.5
3.19
Betty Ragan
published 3.5
3.15
Michelle Willm
published
3.03
Terri Vick-Phillips
published
2.90
Jeanne Stone
published
2.81
Arlene Wilkes
published 3
2.78
Pamela Skiles
published
2.75
Kristen Sojourner
published
2.65
M Brinkley
published
2.65
Micki Barber
published
Judith Bessinger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Bessinger + Micki Barber4738% games−3.8% vs expected
Judith Bessinger + M Brinkley0637% games−5.6% vs expected
Pamela Skiles + Jeanne Stone224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Willm + Micki Barber134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Faile
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Rita Squires
29W–43L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Denise Holmes
20W–28L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Betty Ragan
15W–27L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Michelle Willm
65W–84L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.15
Terri Vick-Phillips
6W–18L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jeanne Stone
25W–31L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Arlene Wilkes
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Pamela Skiles
25W–58L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Kristen Sojourner
33W–39L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
M Brinkley
42W–74L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Micki Barber
23W–74L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Judith Bessinger
15W–31L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.