Teams

TNT

2022 Fredericksburg Tri-Level Mixed · Fredericksburg Tri-Level Mixed 4.0,3.5,3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-08vs Smart Aces TLWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Thompson / Joseph Yoshimura vs Q Pennings / Nancy Siems6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Yoshimura / Catherine Stokes vs Joseph Conti / Maggie van Zandt7-6, 7-6
2022-09-26vs FCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Hyman / Dorota Sipko vs Telly Salafia / Zach Goforth6-4, 7-5
2022-09-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Hyman / Teresa Wallendjack vs Cynthia Robinson / Mani Dakshina6-3, 6-4
2022-09-12vs FCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Yoshimura / Rachael Day vs Brian McDermott / Maggie van Zandt6-4, 7-5
2022-08-28vs Smart Aces TLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Apodaca / Teresa Wallendjack vs Jason Gordon / Nancy Siems2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Yoshimura / Tracey Nankivel vs Chris Baylor / Carlene Gordon5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-27vs Dominators MXWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Hyman / Dorota Sipko vs Jennifer Isham / Scott Hyldahl6-3, 6-0
2022-08-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Wallendjack / Pat Gillespie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Tri-Level Mixed 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Joseph Yoshimura
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carlo Gonzales
published 3.5
Erika Subkanha
published 3.5
3.01
Teresa Wallendjack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.81
Tara Ford
published
Michal Turek
published
Pat Gillespie
published
Rachael Day
published
Susan Thompson
published
Tang Subkanha
published
Tracey Nankivel
published
William George
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorota Sipko + Joseph Yoshimura13167% gamesnot enough data
William George + Dorota Sipko5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joseph Yoshimura
113W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carlo Gonzales
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Erika Subkanha
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Teresa Wallendjack
63W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Michal Turek
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pat Gillespie
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachael Day
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Thompson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tang Subkanha
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracey Nankivel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William George
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.