Teams

Westwood Caudill

2026 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-30vs ACAC No Strings Attached - JonesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Berry / Elizabeth Brogan vs Amy Romero / Jodi Tandett4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Singleton / Ashley Sommardahl vs Tracey Watson / Jessica Cox2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Grossman / Bianca Nunes vs Mari Litz / Kimberly Williams4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Buchanan / Beth Wong vs Jennifer Byers / Kim Corazzini4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-15vs SCC Strings of Glory - WeisigerWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Sheridan / Bianca Nunes vs Brooke Gilbert / Lauren Schuster6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAubrey Moore / Sara Sloman vs Stacey Gray / Avery Horgan6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJana Chesley / Caroline Caudill vs Carla Shaffer / BRANDY NICKEL1-6, 1-6
2026-08-09vs TCRC-HallWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Berry / Caley Wilson vs Katherine Mortimer / Melissa Skorupa1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Brogan / Melanie Grossman vs Carolyn Elgin / Amanda Stoneburner2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Singleton / Jana Chesley vs Pam Berger / Nancy Priddy6-3, 6-0
2026-08-01vs Hermitage ThompsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Buchanan / Aubrey Moore vs Stephanie Yablonski / Kathryn Horsley1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Grossman / Conway Bowman vs Sidney Mayer / Meredith Thompson4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCaley Wilson / Katherine Singleton vs Tracy Teal / Kirsten Mullaney5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Erin Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Aubrey Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Aubrey Fraser
published 3.5
3.09
Bianca Nunes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.09
Kelly Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Sara Sloman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Melanie Grossman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Katherine Singleton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Amanda Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Conway Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Elizabeth Brogan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Caley Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Jana Chesley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Ashley Sommardahl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Caroline Caudill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Buchanan + Bianca Nunes3445% games+10.4% vs expected
Melanie Grossman + Katherine Singleton404 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Sommardahl + Elizabeth Brogan213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Berry + Katherine Singleton303 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Brogan + Jana Chesley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Sheridan
29W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Aubrey Moore
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Aubrey Fraser
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3
Bianca Nunes
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
Kelly Berry
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
Sara Sloman
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Melanie Grossman
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Katherine Singleton
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Amanda Buchanan
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Conway Bowman
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Elizabeth Brogan
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Caley Wilson
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Jana Chesley
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Ashley Sommardahl
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Caroline Caudill
5W–9L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.