Teams

BC-AltaVista/KarieLanterman

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Lanterman / Karie Lanterman vs Jing Feng / Katrina Antonio6-4, 6-0
2023-05-06vs BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartiniWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Lanterman / Karie Lanterman vs Lisa Drexinger / Debra White6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2023-04-16vs BC-Kramer/TanyaDrawerLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Lanterman / Karie Lanterman vs Donna-Marie Ericson / Christine Ball7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Yoko Ishizuka
published
3.61
Rie Miyake
published
3.51
Celeste Torres
published 3.5
3.47
Sue Bingham
published
3.36
Betty Torng
published 3.5
3.35
Michelle Lanterman
published
3.34
Gretchen Albarian
published
3.32
Annie Ho
published 3.5
3.28
Belmarie Huynh
published 3.5
3.20
Cynthia Catibog
published 3.5
3.10
Kathy Inouye
published
3.08
Kazumi Kono
published
2.96
Mary Ann Foard
published
2.95
Koko King
published
2.68
Karie Lanterman
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Tina Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Torng + Celeste Torres303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yoko Ishizuka
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Rie Miyake
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Celeste Torres
46W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
Sue Bingham
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Betty Torng
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
Michelle Lanterman
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
Gretchen Albarian
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Annie Ho
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Belmarie Huynh
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Catibog
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Kathy Inouye
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
Kazumi Kono
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.08
Mary Ann Foard
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Koko King
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Karie Lanterman
136W–186L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Tina Jackson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.