Teams

Blasdel/MH/LR&F

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-27vs Drennin/Stuffelbeam/MH/LR&FWon 32
W#1 DoublesSarah Edwards / Margaret Byrd vs Sarah Blagg / Missy Babin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMariko Kobayashi vs Nicole Horne6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKandie Walker / Leeann Hutson vs Marsha Partney / Tera Moore3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKelsey Kolb vs Peyton Thompson1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCara Coleman / Jennifer Houghtaling vs Jillian Bemis / Kaytlin Avery3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-16vs Drennin/Stuffelbeam/MH/LR&FLost 23
W#1 DoublesSarah Edwards / Kelsey Kolb vs Tera Moore / Sarah Blagg7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSara Recktenwald vs Peyton Thompson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Byrd / Jennifer Houghtaling vs Casey Drennin / Theia Foley6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAllyson Woods vs Nicole Horne1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKandie Walker / Leeann Hutson vs Jillian Bemis / Kaytlin Avery3-6, 3-6
2025-04-13vs Drennin/Stuffelbeam/MH/LR&FWon 41
L#1 DoublesCara Coleman / Sarah Edwards vs Theia Foley / Tera Moore6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKelsey Kolb vs Casey Drennin6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Houghtaling / Margaret Byrd vs Marsha Partney / Jill Czanstkowski6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMariko Kobayashi vs Peyton Thompson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAshton Wehmeyer / Karissa Eaton vs Leah Keller / Kim Brown3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-04-09vs Drennin/Stuffelbeam/MH/LR&FLost 23
W#1 DoublesKelsey Kolb / Jennifer Houghtaling vs Nicole Horne / Tera Moore6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarmen Jones vs Kapra Stuffelbeam6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAshton Wehmeyer / Sarah Edwards vs Leah Keller / Kim Brown1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAllyson Woods vs Peyton Thompson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKarissa Eaton / Cara Coleman vs Jillian Bemis / Kaytlin Avery3-6, 4-6
2025-04-06vs Drennin/Stuffelbeam/MH/LR&FWon 32
W#1 DoublesJennifer Houghtaling / Margaret Byrd vs Sarah Blagg / Tera Moore6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSara Recktenwald vs Kapra Stuffelbeam6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMariko Kobayashi / Sarah Edwards vs Nicole Horne / Jill Czanstkowski6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCarmen Jones vs Peyton Thompson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKarissa Eaton / Cara Coleman vs Kaytlin Avery / Jillian Bemis5-7, 1-6
2025-04-05vs Drennin/Stuffelbeam/MH/LR&FWon 32
L#1 DoublesSarah Edwards / Ashton Wehmeyer vs Jillian Bemis / Kaytlin Avery3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCarmen Jones vs Nicole Horne2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Houghtaling / Margaret Byrd vs Marsha Partney / Jill Czanstkowski6-0, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMariko Kobayashi vs Peyton Thompson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKarissa Eaton / Cara Coleman vs Sarah Blagg / Missy Babin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Alisa Blasdel
published 4
3.05
Jennifer Houghtaling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Margaret Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Cara Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Ashton Wehmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carmen Jones
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.54
Leeann Hutson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Allyson Woods
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Kandie Walker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karissa Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelsey Kolb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Mariko Kobayashi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sara Recktenwald
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sarah Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Houghtaling + Margaret Byrd5062% gamesnot enough data
Karissa Eaton + Cara Coleman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alisa Blasdel
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Jennifer Houghtaling
12W–0L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Margaret Byrd
9W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Cara Coleman
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Ashton Wehmeyer
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carmen Jones
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leeann Hutson
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Allyson Woods
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kandie Walker
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karissa Eaton
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Kolb
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariko Kobayashi
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Recktenwald
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Edwards
5W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.