Teams

Cheval - M. Schmitt

2023 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-06vs Hills / L. GreenleeWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Kensrue / Mary Paul vs Janet Hoffman / Tarja Kostin3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-02-27vs Hills / L. GreenleeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Paul / Cindy Kensrue vs Janet Hoffman / Linda Bacon6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHelen Chan / Teresa Rizzo vs Lee Greenlee / Tarja Kostin6-1, 6-1
2023-02-13vs Hills / L. GreenleeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Schmitt / Helen Chan vs Linda Bacon / Tarja Kostin1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Stablein / Valerie Elvin vs Marti Turocy / Janet George1-6, 2-6
2023-01-30vs Hills / L. GreenleeLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Rizzo / Mary Schmitt vs Linda Bacon / Tarja Kostin0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Stablein / Valerie Elvin vs Ida-M Pedersen / Helene Kennedy-Peterson5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Paul / Cindy Kensrue vs Janet George / Marti Turocy3-6, 2-6
2023-01-23vs Hills / L. GreenleeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesValerie Elvin / Diane Stablein vs Janet George / Marti Turocy0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebbie Beardsley / Mary Schmitt vs Ida-M Pedersen / Helene Kennedy-Peterson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-01-16vs Hills / L. GreenleeLost 01
L#3 DoublesTeresa Rizzo / Mary Schmitt vs Linda Bacon / Helene Kennedy-Peterson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Diane Stablein
published 4
Debbie Beardsley
published 4
3.69
Lynn O'Brien
published
3.50
Valerie Elvin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Cindy Kensrue
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Schmitt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Linda Miller
published
Holly Charles
published
Mary Klein
published
Teresa Rizzo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Elvin + Diane Stablein4163% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Rizzo + Mary Schmitt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Stablein
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Debbie Beardsley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn O'Brien
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Cindy Kensrue
31W–28L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Mary Schmitt
65W–151L career · 4 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Linda Miller
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.02
Holly Charles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Klein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Rizzo
19W–18L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.