Teams

Pelican Marsh - Barger

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-12-08vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristine Laterra / Carla Klumpp vs Melody Miller / Cheryl Toth6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaren Hole vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSunny Barger / Brenda Rhoda vs Kristen Catino / Shelley Boggess6-7, 3-6
2020-12-01vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 10
W#1 DoublesSunny Barger / Marie Shoaf vs Allison Baker / Ann Heinauer6-4, 6-3
2020-11-17vs Olde Cypress - NavarroWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarie Shoaf / Kristine Laterra vs Kristen Catino / Shelley Boggess6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrenda Rhoda / Lauren Keillor vs Lori Coates / Angela Springer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2020-11-12vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Lauren Keillor vs Kimberly Davey / Amber Hill6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSunny Barger / Debra Bowenkamp vs Dayna Webre / Mia Delk6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2020-11-10vs World Tennis Center - BadiuLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Tracy Glass vs Jocelyn Badiu / Maureen Wells5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Hole vs Carole Flegel2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSunny Barger / Marie Shoaf vs Michele Nelson-Baker / Lisa Ruffolo6-3, 6-4
2020-11-03vs Marco YMCA - J. HeiseSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Teresa Madonia vs Karen Huffman / Carrie Masci3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSunny Barger / Brenda Rhoda vs Andrea Washak / Marzenna Nowak6-2, 6-4
2020-10-27vs Rapallo - PacanaLost 03
L#1 DoublesSunny Barger / Lauren Keillor vs Lisa Kresse / Vesna Petrovic1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Hole vs Marilyn Mooney4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Madonia / Diana Pleeter vs Jane Zito / Sheri Coleman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSunny Barger / Kristine Laterra vs MacKenzie Rickman / Heidi Stock3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Rhoda / Lauren Keillor vs Nancy Harbert / Debra Logue2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Diana Pleeter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Marie Shoaf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Carla Klumpp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Sunny Barger
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.62
Karen Hole
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.48
Brenda Rhoda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Lauren Keillor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Rhoda + Sunny Barger495049% games+3.6% vs expected
Sunny Barger + Marie Shoaf111349% games+0.4% vs expected
Diana Pleeter + Marie Shoaf221453% games−0.2% vs expected
Diana Pleeter + Lauren Keillor191450% games−3.7% vs expected
Carla Klumpp + Sunny Barger131547% games−3.8% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Lauren Keillor101149% games−4.8% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Karen Hole6753% gamesnot enough data
Sunny Barger + Diana Pleeter10261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Pleeter
139W–84L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Marie Shoaf
160W–135L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Carla Klumpp
99W–93L career · 1 line in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Sunny Barger
206W–211L career · 7 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Karen Hole
99W–147L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Brenda Rhoda
141W–148L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Lauren Keillor
161W–184L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.