Teams

SSC Grossman 55

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 6.0 W Monday

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-22vs Sarasota/Voltz/55&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Carothers / Kristine Tabone vs Mary Alice Collins / Robin Ettinger2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Grossman / Laurie Ramocki vs Lori Campbell / Penny Denault2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Menezes / Mary Scott vs Angela Radigan / Patricia Ruggero2-6, 5-7
2025-03-17vs LBK Club SerlingLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Carothers / Laurie Ramocki vs Laura Muth / Jill Serling1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Scott / Cindy Connelly vs Bethany Buck / Judy Mitchell2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEileen Grossman / Allison Menezes vs Sue Randall / Leila Sakhai6-2, 7-6
2025-03-14vs Heritage Oaks HottiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Carothers / Laurie Ramocki vs Jodie Titus / Beth Gemmill1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLori Ann Seguin / Eileen Grossman vs Wendy Campbell / Lisa Falk4-6, 4-4
W#3 DoublesMary Scott / Cindy Connelly vs Ruth Bilodeau / Linda Richcreek6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-03vs Payne Park HuelsterLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Carothers / Lori Ann Seguin vs Pamela Huelster / Sheryl King4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCindy Connelly / Mary Scott vs Sony Martinez / Nancy Lagnese6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaurie Ramocki / Eileen Grossman vs Susan Green / Maureen Curtin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-17vs LWR AlsterLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaurie Coleman / Patricia Carothers vs Joyce Furlonger / Sylvia Day7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllison Menezes / Lori Ann Seguin vs Martha Jepsky / Joani Crean6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Scott / Cindy Connelly vs Maria Corpina / Lynne Bouton4-6, 3-6
2025-02-10vs Courtside 50 LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Carothers / Lori Ann Seguin vs Pam Aber / Nina Bouclainville1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Moore / Eileen Grossman vs Martha Forward / Shelley Griffin5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Connelly / Mary Scott vs Christine Wilson / Liz Morris4-6, 6-7
2025-01-20vs University Park LundinLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Ann Seguin / Eileen Grossman vs Elizabeth Berkman / Alison Sackley0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Ramocki / Jacqueline Moore vs Julie Forde / Kathleen Levinstim0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Scott / Cindy Connelly vs Sandra Lundin / Barbara Diehl6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-29vs LBK Public SmithLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Ann Seguin / Kristine Tabone vs Valri Poley / Dana Marpoe3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPatricia Carothers / Laurie Ramocki vs Jennifer Lackland / Elizabeth Reinhardt3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEileen Grossman / Allison Menezes vs Debbie White / Rebecca Schlecht4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jacqueline Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Lori Ann Seguin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Allison Menezes
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.33
Cindy Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.31
Eileen Grossman
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Julie Turner
published
Kristine Tabone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Ramocki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mona Harrington
published
Patricia Carothers
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Menezes + Julie Turner0532% gamesnot enough data
Kristine Tabone + Laurie Ramocki1437% gamesnot enough data
Lori Ann Seguin + Allison Menezes044 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Carothers + Laurie Ramocki033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jacqueline Moore
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Ann Seguin
2W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Allison Menezes
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
3
Cindy Connelly
13W–21L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.33
3
Eileen Grossman
4W–31L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.31
Julie Turner
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Tabone
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Coleman
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Ramocki
4W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mona Harrington
128W–145L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Carothers
5W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.