Teams

Ft Gatlin-Phan

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 40 & Over - SPRING-NIGHT · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-22vs ORANGE/Keiling/40&Over/4.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesSenien Hicks / Kenton Wu vs Kenton Keiling / John Reich3-6, 3-6
2025-05-15vs USTA Campus-MongeLost 12
L#1 DoublesKenton Wu / Mike Duong vs NAWELL PEREZ / Gustavo Gomez1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesScott Baker / Esu Ma'At vs Fabricio Correa / Gilberto Brandolezi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIvan Rincon / Peter Vu vs Nelson San Pedro / Ernesto Gonzalez6-2, 6-2
2025-04-24vs USTA Campus-MongeLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Vu / Senien Hicks vs Fabricio Correa / Celso Percegona Filho3-6, 6-7
2025-04-03vs USTA Campus-MongeWon 10
W#3 DoublesYoussef Gara / Senien Hicks vs Gilberto Brandolezi / Eugenio MacOuzet Sr6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
George Newton
published
4.11
Rahman Pesciotta
published
3.88
Senien Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Mike Duong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Eric Acosta
published
3.76
Kenton Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Ivan Rincon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Jared Remington
published
3.15
Tom Phan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Esu Ma'At
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Vu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Simon Bravo
published
Stephen Colavito
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenton Wu + Mike Duong5253% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Newton
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.64
Rahman Pesciotta
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Senien Hicks
18W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
Mike Duong
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Eric Acosta
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Kenton Wu
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Ivan Rincon
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
Jared Remington
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.56
Tom Phan
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Esu Ma'At
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peter Vu
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Simon Bravo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Colavito
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.