Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W PM

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-03vs Salt Lake Tennis-BickmoreWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacy Dyer / Gelyn Pauly vs Mari Bickmore / Lili Leiataua Iosefa6-3, 6-1
2024-05-20Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKayeLynn BASTIAN / Sachiko Osterloh vs Muranda Barker / Naomi Stroud-Peterson6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Cheng / Lisa Pappas vs Tori Locke / Kassie Butt3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Logan / Mariya Coleman vs Jessica Eckert / Emily Matheson2-6, 5-7
2024-05-13vs Sunpro-Goff/MurraySplit 11
L#1 DoublesNatasha Gines / Rebecca Harman vs Jennifer Hoffman / SalleeAnn Miller6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDelia Bayna / Sachiko Osterloh vs Christine Gouff / Margaret Lindsay6-1, 6-1
2024-05-06Split 11
L#1 DoublesStacy Dyer / Lisa Pappas vs Lori Carter / Krissie Summerhays4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSachiko Osterloh vs Kerry Davis6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-29Won 20
W#1 DoublesSachiko Osterloh / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Janelle Freund / Lindsay Gehman6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMiranda Tilley / Natasha Gines vs Megan Berceau / Shelly Kaihatu4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-27vs Liberty Park Tennis-KeslerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKayeLynn BASTIAN / Sachiko Osterloh vs Kyoko Jensen / Heidi Chytraus6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRebecca Harman / Kalaiselvi Seetharaman vs Melina Ward / Lori Prince Hagood2-6, 4-6
2024-04-15vs Liberty Park Tennis-TorresWon 10
W#1 DoublesSachiko Osterloh / Lisa Pappas vs Nicole Leatham / Betsy Ostrander6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-08vs Salt Lake Tennis-BickmoreWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Pappas / Sachiko Osterloh vs Stephanie Favila / Ann Chenoweth6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Sachiko Osterloh
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.01
Jamie Sorensen
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Miranda Tilley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3
2.91
Jennifer Wily
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Harman
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
2.86
Stephanie Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Natasha Plyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.78
Gelyn Pauly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Cari Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.62
Mariya Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Lisa Pappas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Stacy Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristen Logan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Natasha Gines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nooshin Prasthofer
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #2 Singles 41% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mariya Coleman + Rebecca Harman3260% games+8.5% vs expected
Jennifer Wily + Delia Bayna14554% games+0.7% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Delia Bayna2738% games+0.3% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Lisa Pappas2348% games+0.3% vs expected
Jamie Sorensen + Delia Bayna2351% games+0.3% vs expected
Sachiko Osterloh + KayeLynn BASTIAN7264% games−0.3% vs expected
Cari Johnson + Rebecca Harman4357% games−0.6% vs expected
Gelyn Pauly + Miranda Tilley174139% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sachiko Osterloh
26W–27L career · 7 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Jamie Sorensen
78W–102L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Miranda Tilley
35W–76L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Jennifer Wily
120W–177L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Rebecca Harman
241W–300L career · 17 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.89
Stephanie Cheng
8W–14L career · 9 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.86
3
Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
82W–91L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Natasha Plyer
22W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Gelyn Pauly
50W–93L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 11 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 19 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Mariya Coleman
14W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.62
Lisa Pappas
30W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Stacy Dyer
4W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
Kristen Logan
25W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Natasha Gines
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
97W–124L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.