Teams

KY/LOU/BAYLON/HELFRICH

2026 USTA FALL 40 & OVER LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Ashley Dehner
published 3.5
3.15
Kristi Whistle
published
3.14
Erin Sexton
published
3.02
Danielle Strong
published 3.5
3.01
Janet Parrish
published
3.01
Laura Mahoney
published
2.94
Jina Kang
published
2.91
Amanda Helfrich
published 3
2.86
Judette Baylon
published
2.85
Marilyn Croak
published
2.63
Jamie Hancock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jina Kang + Amanda Helfrich5453% games+7.7% vs expected
Kristi Whistle + Erin Sexton2347% games−6.0% vs expected
Jamie Hancock + Judette Baylon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Dehner
32W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Kristi Whistle
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Erin Sexton
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Danielle Strong
13W–9L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Janet Parrish
24W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Laura Mahoney
15W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Jina Kang
20W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Amanda Helfrich
17W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Judette Baylon
22W–18L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Marilyn Croak
21W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Jamie Hancock
11W–19L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.