Teams

Middleburg

2021 SVTA Adult 40 & Over Women · Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-08-03vs AdlerWon 10
W#2 DoublesRuth Schierenbeck / Sharon Linares vs Nancy Colan / Andrea Hallett6-2, 6-2
2021-07-29vs 40 LuvLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / Susan Egan vs Robbie Marchant / Dana Kelly4-6, 4-6
2021-07-27vs Love is a BattlefieldWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharon Linares / Michelle Abalos vs Lisa Furgal / Karen Sullivan6-2, 6-4
2021-07-22vs Girls Just want to have SunLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / Michelle Abalos vs Kelly Mitchum / Maria Sinnott6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2021-07-20Split 11
L#1 SinglesSharon Linares vs Sian Perez-Baumann3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Mandia / Michelle Abalos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-13vs WCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesSharon Linares vs Niki Gerhard2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-07-06vs Nix/ProvidakesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Linares / Katylou Gray vs Pamela Nix / Jeanne Dattilo5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Mandia / Sheila Harrell vs April Providakes / Alexandra Castleberry7-5, 7-5
2021-07-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / Susan Egan vs Christine Driscoll / Lynn Koggan6-1, 6-1
2021-06-29vs LGCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheila Harrell / Susan Jones vs Lucy Townsend / Rhonda Green6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Michelle Abalos
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Sharon Linares
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Sheila Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Emily Hannum
published 3.5
3.24
Maureen St Germain
published
3.15
Jane Covington
published
3.02
Julie Mandia
published
2.45
Susan Jones
published
Molly Ewert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Linares + Michelle Abalos25663% games+6.4% vs expected
Sheila Harrell + Michelle Abalos5459% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Harrell + Sharon Linares5074% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michelle Abalos
145W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Sharon Linares
162W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Sheila Harrell
132W–87L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Emily Hannum
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen St Germain
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Jane Covington
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
Julie Mandia
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
Susan Jones
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.45
Molly Ewert
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.