Teams

Team 2

2023 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over Fall · NOVA Tri-Level Men 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrew Duke / Anthony Coco vs Ryan Kim / Kenneth Jiang5-7, 3-6
2023-11-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnthony Coco / Patrick Hendy vs Andrew Cheng / William Watkins6-3, 6-3
2023-10-25vs Team 6 The WarriorsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnthony Coco / Kaj Vetter vs JANAK MEHTA / Raj Indugula4-6, 3-6
2023-10-04vs Team 4 Swinging JohnsonsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn O'Dwyer / Liviu Carare vs Gary McManis / Nicholas Colletti6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-27vs Team 7Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnthony Coco / Chris Meyer vs Kevin McKeel / Thomas McCrary6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level Men 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Liviu Carare
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Michael Fogarty
published
4.05
John O'Dwyer
published
4.03
Peter Davidson
published
4.00
Bruce MacHanic
published
3.84
Kaj Vetter
published
3.55
Anthony Coco
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Ted McLaughlan
published
3.24
Chris Meyer
published 3.5
3.08
Andrew Duke
published 3.5
Matt Breslin
published
Michael Caudill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaj Vetter + John O'Dwyer4158% games−2.9% vs expected
Ted McLaughlan + Chris Meyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Liviu Carare
227W–119L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%6%
4.29
Michael Fogarty
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
John O'Dwyer
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
4.05
Peter Davidson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Bruce MacHanic
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
Kaj Vetter
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.84
3.5
Anthony Coco
31W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
Ted McLaughlan
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Chris Meyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Andrew Duke
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Matt Breslin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Caudill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.