Teams

EW-PC-Brown

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-12vs WRAC-Van HoutenWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephen Allen / Michael Jacoby vs Brian Flones / Michael Militescu7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarry Vedder / John Smoot vs Steve Wolcott / Mike Christianson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaryl Brown / Marty Munson vs Scott Tucker / Frank Sinek6-2, 6-1
2026-04-11vs WRAC-Van HoutenWon 30
W#1 DoublesBart Munson / Michael Jacoby vs Brian Flones / Michael Daines6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaryl Brown / John Hilmes vs Steve Wolcott / Michael Militescu6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarty Munson / John Smoot vs Scott Tucker / Mike Christianson6-4, 6-1
2026-04-10vs WRAC-Van HoutenWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Hilmes / Bart Munson vs Roger van Houten / Michael Daines6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDaryl Brown / Michael Jacoby vs Brian Flones / Steve Wolcott4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarry Vedder / Stephen Allen vs Scott Tucker / Frank Sinek6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Bart Munson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
John Hilmes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Stephen Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Daryl Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Michael Jacoby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Barry Vedder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
John Smoot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marty Munson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hilmes + Daryl Brown13654% games+1.2% vs expected
Barry Vedder + Stephen Allen7550% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bart Munson
19W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
John Hilmes
66W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Stephen Allen
42W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Daryl Brown
34W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Michael Jacoby
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Barry Vedder
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.63
John Smoot
16W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marty Munson
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.