Teams

Marion/Steed/40&Over4.0W

2024 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult Women 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-04vs FK - BarletWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebby Watts / Susan Atwell vs Susan Garrick / Andrea Harden6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-29vs FK - BarletWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebby Watts / Terri Finn vs Jill Kimball / Barbara Slatton6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza vs Marianne Marcoux / Julie Haynes6-1, 6-2
2024-04-20vs FK - BarletSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Steed / Debby Watts vs Pamela Plumlee / Nancy Little6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDina Sapienza / Hollie Powell vs Kimberly Scudder Thompson / Julie Haynes6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-15vs FK - BarletWon 20
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Nicole Wigelsworth vs Irina Madorsky / Laura Flanagan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Atwell / Debby Watts vs Barbara Slatton / Julie Haynes6-3, 6-4
2024-04-06vs FK - BarletLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebby Watts / Lisa Steed vs Pamela Plumlee / Jill Kimball2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Miller / Eileen Lombardo vs Laura Flanagan / Susan Garrick3-6, 4-6
2024-03-25vs FK - BarletWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebby Watts / Terri Finn vs Jill Kimball / Pamela Plumlee6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDina Sapienza / Hollie Powell vs Beatrice Barlet / Wendy MacMurray6-2, 6-2
2024-03-18vs FK - BarletSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Nicole Millsaps vs Susan Garrick / Laura Flanagan7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebby Watts / Nicole Wigelsworth vs Barbara Slatton / Julie Haynes6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Eileen Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Debby Watts
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.74
Dana Pine
published 4
3.68
Terri Finn
published
3.66
Nicole Millsaps
published
3.64
Lisa Steed
published
3.61
Susan Atwell
published
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
3.31
Hollie Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Lombardo + Dina Sapienza314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Debby Watts
186W–79L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Dana Pine
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Terri Finn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.68
Nicole Millsaps
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.66
Lisa Steed
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Susan Atwell
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Hollie Powell
26W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.