Teams

FH Net Crashers - C. Deming

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 SinglesEvonski Lennear vs Lara Saade6-3, 6-4
2022-05-19vs Davis Island - J. MaxwellLost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Davidson / Deb Spears vs Beth Higgins / Vicki Camposano3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNorma Solters / Deb Spears vs Angie Giovenco / Mary Murray7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Davidson / Evonski Lennear vs Bonnie Neal / Marie Stone6-3, 6-3
2022-05-05vs TYCC Get A Grip - Murtagh/EllisWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeb Spears / STEPHANIE Hardin vs Mary Ann Dellegatto / Paige Murtagh6-3, 6-4
2022-04-28vs Plant City - D. RegisterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephane Duroseau / Deb Spears vs Linda Leber / Dang Williamson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJillian Baizan / Evonski Lennear vs Nicole Giusto / Cassie Miller6-7, 1-6
2022-04-21vs Buckhorn Hitwomen - T. ManganelloWon 10
W#2 DoublesJillian Baizan / Evonski Lennear vs Sondra Jackson / Dena Linthicum5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-14vs FH Fireballs - N. KippWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeb Spears / Catherine Davidson vs Monica Eiermann / Tabetha Vandeboe6-3, 6-4
2022-04-12vs Davis Island - J. MaxwellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephane Duroseau / Evonski Lennear vs Laura Salzer / Luz Maria von Greiff4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Flynn / Deb Spears vs Jane Maxwell / Nicole Malone7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesStephane Duroseau / Deb Spears vs Melissa Wolfe / Brenda Sandy6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Deb Spears
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.57
Stephane Duroseau
published
3.20
Jesse Glassford
published
3.15
Mary Flynn
published
3.14
Evonski Lennear
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Carrie Deming
published 3.5
2.95
STEPHANIE Hardin
published
2.89
Jillian Baizan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deb Spears + Evonski Lennear7258% gamesnot enough data
Evonski Lennear + Mary Flynn224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deb Spears
231W–146L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Stephane Duroseau
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
Jesse Glassford
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Mary Flynn
8W–32L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Evonski Lennear
53W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Carrie Deming
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
STEPHANIE Hardin
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
Jillian Baizan
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.