Teams

KAllen (Raintree)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.35 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-03vs LAndersen (Chestnut Square)Won 30
W#1 DoublesErin Moser / Staci Wittek vs Mary McGarvey / Becky Shopf6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKaren Allen / Alyson Sunden vs Stephanie Gossert / Yukiko Cooper6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLesley Quick / Denise Dexter vs Teri Snoke / Lynsey Weber6-4, 7-5
2023-09-26vs MTurturro (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKatrina Richards / Karen Allen vs Jennifer Kwasniewski / Eileen Jones6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRenee Ziemianski / Megan Collier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-19vs SGrindle (Weddington)Won 21
L#1 DoublesKatrina Richards / Megan Collier vs Anita Corum / Sally Blocksom1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Erin Moser vs Stacey Herndon / Jurga Petrikis7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLesley Quick / Denise Dexter vs Sandra Torres / Jeri Zangmeister6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-09-12vs CMiles (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesErin Moser / Alyson Sunden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLesley Quick / Kimberlee Curley vs Ramonette Belen / Renee Cauble6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRachel Hallsten / Katrina Richards vs Patricia Fleming / Maria Solorzano6-0, 6-0
2023-09-05vs JMiles (Life Time)Won 30
W#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Jill Smith vs Julie Dailly / Jennifer Siddall6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlyson Sunden / Diann Hickson vs Alison Oxendine / Gladys Shinmoto6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatrina Richards / Erin Moser vs Jennifer Miles / Catherine Holwager6-3, 6-0
2023-08-29vs MMetzl (Sardis)Won 21
W#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Jill Smith vs Sarah Asby / Katherine Jay7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlyson Sunden / Diann Hickson vs Mandy Occhipinti / Sharon Storck6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDenise Dexter / Lesley Quick vs Claudia Prager / Kiera Young6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-26vs TMagee/LDiman (Carmel)Split 11
W#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Jill Smith vs Elizabeth Workman / Debbie Starling6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRenee Ziemianski / Denise Dexter vs Jill Halverstam / Tricia Magee4-6, 2-6
2023-08-22vs THyso (Life Time)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLesley Quick / Erin Moser vs Angela Dotson / Heather Tselentis6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJill Smith / Staci Wittek vs Wendy Ranadive / Karen Moss7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKimberlee Curley / Robin Estridge vs Jennifer Hall / Cristin Lee6-1, 6-4
2023-08-08vs KBritt/AChristie (PPRSC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Moser / Alyson Sunden vs Kathleen Johnstone / Tiffany Vaughn2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatrina Richards / Renee Ziemianski vs Karin Britt / Marisa Haehnlein7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Dexter / Robin Estridge vs Mindy Zimmerman / Joan Carney4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Katrina Richards
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Lesley Quick
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Alyson Sunden
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Renee Ziemianski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Robin Estridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Erin Moser
published 3.5
3.15
Staci Wittek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Kimberlee Curley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Denise Dexter
published 3
2.71
Diann Hickson
published 3
Megan Collier
published
Rachel Hallsten
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesley Quick + Alyson Sunden5357% games+8.2% vs expected
Lesley Quick + Katrina Richards261258% games+2.8% vs expected
Alyson Sunden + Katrina Richards7453% games−3.9% vs expected
Staci Wittek + Robin Estridge1641% gamesnot enough data
Staci Wittek + Alyson Sunden3450% gamesnot enough data
Staci Wittek + Katrina Richards3445% gamesnot enough data
Erin Moser + Katrina Richards314 matchesnot enough data
Renee Ziemianski + Alyson Sunden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katrina Richards
152W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Lesley Quick
83W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Alyson Sunden
75W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Renee Ziemianski
16W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Robin Estridge
27W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Erin Moser
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Staci Wittek
99W–96L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.15
3
Kimberlee Curley
46W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Denise Dexter
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Diann Hickson
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
Megan Collier
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Hallsten
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.