Teams

Dingo/Ruano

2025 USTA League Adult 18 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 3.5 WOMEN 18N1S3D

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-14vs Lyons/Brackett 3.5 18 Fall 24Won 31
W#1 DoublesKatie Hartman / Diana LaChance vs Parker Howard / Katie Adams6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathleen Callejo vs Tahirih Lackey6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheri Rustic / Anna Mctaggart vs Victoria Linson / Nilmini Thompson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCaroline Kimminau / Xuejiao Chen vs Brittany Martin / Michelle Howell6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2024-11-12vs Presson 3.5 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesDiana LaChance / Sarah Paulson vs Alicia Howard / Ginger Green6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEstephany Ruano / Heather Vinas vs Callie Beckham / Christina Voelkel7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaggie Hartman / Katie Hartman vs Cristy Presson / Emylee Grubb6-2, 6-2
2024-10-30vs Kennamer- 18Won 40
W#1 DoublesDiana LaChance / Sarah Paulson vs Kathy Smith / Diana Fulkerson7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMary Hannah Robinson vs Cristin Liveoak6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHannah Page Bell / Sheri Rustic vs Michelle Roth / Lauren Wasley6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEstephany Ruano / Leah Snoddy vs Lisa Greer / Shari Moxley6-2, 6-1
2024-10-23vs HU - LlewellynLost 04
L#1 DoublesKatie Hartman / Sarah Paulson vs Catherine Kelly / Maribeth Newman5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Callejo vs Maya Jones3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Hannah Robinson / Diana LaChance vs Emily Smith / Melissa Jose5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Kimminau / Heather Vinas vs Janice Llewellyn / Ayesha Patel2-6, 5-7
2024-10-20vs Brinkley Wester 18+ 3.5Split 22
L#1 DoublesKatie Hartman / Maggie Hartman vs Jenny Gibson / Leslie Crosby6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDiana LaChance vs Jennifer Brinkley6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEstephany Ruano / Heather Vinas vs Leslie Bradford / Andrea Stewart7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChrissy Moorer / Caroline Kimminau vs Marianna Wester / Elizabeth Robertson3-6, 3-6
2024-10-17vs Lyons/Brackett 3.5 18 Fall 24Split 22
L#1 DoublesChrissy Moorer / Mary Hannah Robinson vs Wendy Brandon / Victoria Linson2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDiana LaChance vs Katie Adams6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Hartman / Sarah Paulson vs Giselle Lyons / Parker Howard7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEstephany Ruano / Xuejiao Chen vs Amy Tatsas / Nilmini Thompson4-6, 5-7
2024-10-14vs Presson 3.5 18+Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Hannah Robinson / Hannah Page Bell vs Candice Laroue / Regina Light0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Vinas vs Amanda Flood3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSheri Rustic / Diana LaChance vs Cristy Presson / Alicia Howard2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeah Snoddy / Caroline Kimminau vs Cameron Thumm / Christina Voelkel5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-08vs Kennamer- 18Lost 13
L#1 DoublesLeah Snoddy / Sheri Rustic vs Diana Fulkerson / Kathy Smith2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKathleen Callejo vs Cristin Liveoak1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Paulson / Maggie Hartman vs Jenny Kennamer / Kristin Wallace2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Hannah Robinson / Heather Vinas vs Audrey Lambert / Joy Watson7-6, 6-3
2024-10-06vs HU - LlewellynLost 04
L#1 DoublesDiana LaChance / Mary Hannah Robinson vs Emily Smith / Michelle Jones4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Callejo vs Maya Jones7-5, 0-3
L#2 DoublesHannah Page Bell / Xuejiao Chen vs Catherine Kelly / Maribeth Newman4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Mctaggart / Leah Snoddy vs Melissa Jose / Elizabeth Weiland3-6, 2-6
2024-10-01vs Brinkley Wester 18+ 3.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesSheri Rustic / Sarah Paulson vs Ginger Liles / Hattie Crosby7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDiana LaChance vs Leslie Bradford6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesXuejiao Chen / Leah Snoddy vs Jennifer Brinkley / Caroline Garnett6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Hannah Robinson / Kathleen Callejo vs Andrea Stewart / Leslie Crosby7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN 18N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Heather Vinas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
Sarah Paulson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Katie Hartman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.40
Leah Snoddy
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.40
Diana LaChance
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Mary Hannah Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
3.21
Xuejiao Chen
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Kathleen Callejo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Hannah Page Bell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Sheri Rustic
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Estephany Ruano
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Chrissy Moorer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Lynn Dingo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Anna Mctaggart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Caroline Kimminau
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Xuejiao Chen + Leah Snoddy8068% games+14.2% vs expected
Sarah Paulson + Katie Hartman4546% games+2.6% vs expected
Diana LaChance + Heather Vinas4157% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Rustic + Heather Vinas3244% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Callejo + Katie Hartman3257% gamesnot enough data
Diana LaChance + Katie Hartman134 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Rustic + Lynn Dingo314 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Rustic + Xuejiao Chen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Vinas
22W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Sarah Paulson
11W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Katie Hartman
37W–47L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Leah Snoddy
21W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Diana LaChance
59W–25L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
Mary Hannah Robinson
20W–21L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Xuejiao Chen
36W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kathleen Callejo
20W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Hannah Page Bell
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Sheri Rustic
110W–72L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.14
Estephany Ruano
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Chrissy Moorer
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Lynn Dingo
52W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Anna Mctaggart
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Caroline Kimminau
44W–50L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.