Teams

GEPTA/18-39/7.5M/Cisneros/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 ADULT 18-39 LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 ADULT 18-39 LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18-39/7.5M/Alvidrez/TW7119517181
2GEPTA/18-39/7.5M/Cisneros/EPTC#144121225196
3GEPTA/18-39/7.5M/Dominguez/EPTC#245111636265
4GEPTA/18-39/7.5M/Lopez/EPTC#32791837257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Armando Landa
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Efren Becerra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Hector Montalvo
usually #2 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Ivan Ortiz
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 39% · published
Javier Alvarado
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mauricio Cisneros
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Omar Abbud
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Peter Jilkov
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Raul Santillan
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Robert Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Ryan Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Sebastian Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Victor Tapia
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Efren Becerra + Raul Santillan9357% gamesnot enough data
Robert Hoy + Mauricio Cisneros6361% gamesnot enough data
Omar Abbud + Mauricio Cisneros3452% gamesnot enough data
Omar Abbud + Sebastian Acosta5257% gamesnot enough data
Javier Alvarado + Mauricio Cisneros2542% gamesnot enough data
Mauricio Cisneros + Sebastian Acosta5256% gamesnot enough data
Victor Tapia + Mauricio Cisneros134 matchesnot enough data
Victor Tapia + Sebastian Acosta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Armando Landa
41W–24L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.98
Efren Becerra
45W–21L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hector Montalvo
29W–10L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ivan Ortiz
23W–4L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Javier Alvarado
39W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mauricio Cisneros
72W–64L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Omar Abbud
57W–26L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Jilkov
12W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raul Santillan
32W–17L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Hoy
42W–39L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Rodriguez
6W–2L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sebastian Acosta
23W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victor Tapia
16W–16L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.