Teams

LEvansek (Blakeney)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Tues PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-30vs JHorton (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 SinglesIndranil Bhattacharya vs Ty Ruff6-2, 6-3
2024-07-28Split 11
L#2 SinglesIndranil Bhattacharya vs Allen Hackman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLeonard Evansek vs James Deerkoski6-1, 6-2
2024-07-28vs HMahgoub (PCC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesLeonard Evansek vs Hani Mahgoub6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesFERNANDO CARMINHOLI vs Tim Rodriguez2-6, 1-6
2024-07-09vs DJKulkarni/DHaake (WSRC)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesFERNANDO CARMINHOLI vs Todd Creange0-6, 2-6
2024-07-02Lost 01
L#3 SinglesFERNANDO CARMINHOLI vs David Snyder1-6, 1-6
2024-06-25vs JHorton (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 SinglesLeonard Evansek vs Nevin Sheppard6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2024-06-18Won 10
W#3 SinglesLeonard Evansek vs Matt Zimmerman6-1, 6-0
2024-06-11vs HMahgoub (PCC)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesLeonard Evansek vs Brian Burnett6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesIndranil Bhattacharya vs Raul Zamudio3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesFERNANDO CARMINHOLI vs Matthew Williams1-6, 3-6
2024-05-28Won 20
W#1 SinglesLeonard Evansek vs David Snyder7-5, 7-5
W#3 SinglesIndranil Bhattacharya vs Greg Bartell6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Leonard Evansek
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
PATRICK TIGHE
published
2.90
Indranil Bhattacharya
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
Douglas Harrison
published
2.64
FERNANDO CARMINHOLI
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Jason Hafener
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PATRICK TIGHE + Indranil Bhattacharya314 matchesnot enough data
Jason Hafener + Leonard Evansek213 matchesnot enough data
Leonard Evansek + Indranil Bhattacharya303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leonard Evansek
186W–108L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
PATRICK TIGHE
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Indranil Bhattacharya
35W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Douglas Harrison
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
FERNANDO CARMINHOLI
7W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
Jason Hafener
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.