Teams

9-LCaldwell-SV

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-05vs 3-KEspinola-UNCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Coward / Erika Curry vs Rebecca Badgett / Vera Halpern6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Caryl Schwartzbach6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-19vs 2-KDunn-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMelissa Coward vs Lindsay White6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Flodin / Laura Gallaher vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey / Tanya Werley6-4, 6-3
2022-04-14vs 1-DBaker-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Moseley / Melissa Coward vs Wendy Lindberg / Yolanda Deaver6-3, 6-2
2022-04-05vs 10-ERyan-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Caldwell / Melissa Coward vs Audrey Bilsborrow / Sara Mannone6-2, 6-1
2022-03-24vs 7-mlong-Eno-18+3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesErika Curry / Ann Flodin vs Mary T Long / Kimberly Lamm7-6, 6-0
2022-03-21vs 5-LDubois-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Coward vs Berna Tareen6-0, 6-2
2022-03-17vs 6-LWilliams-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Coward vs Jacqueline Yurkovich6-0, 6-0
2022-03-03vs 4-KLaan-Eno-18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Caldwell / Ann Flodin vs Amber Bruner / Kristi Laan6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Melissa Coward
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.15
Ann Flodin
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.15
Erin McElligott
published 3.5
3.12
Laura Caldwell
published
3.07
Laura Gallaher
published
2.76
Rachel Sendor
published
2.76
Alison Moseley
published 3
Melinda Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin McElligott + Melinda Wright4259% games+11.9% vs expected
Laura Caldwell + Erin McElligott213 matchesnot enough data
Erin McElligott + Ann Flodin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Ann Flodin
65W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.15
3.5
Erin McElligott
31W–20L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Laura Caldwell
43W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.12
Laura Gallaher
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.07
Rachel Sendor
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Alison Moseley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Melinda Wright
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.