← Teams

SFV - Passing Shots

2023 Adult 55+ SFV Summer · SFV 55+ WeekDay - 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-13vs SFV - Dolls With BallsWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesMargery Teller / Miki Lorentz vs Teresa Hatch / Linda Palacios6-3, 6-1
2023-08-13vs SFV LLW - SFVG Double Nickels - Helen McCuskerLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMiki Lorentz / Margery Teller vs Maryann Brandon / Kathleen Foy-Asaro4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-02vs SFV - Dolls With BallsWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesJoanne Carlsen / Miki Lorentz vs Jenny Killgore / Cheryl Stolarski6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Prentice / Margery Teller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-26vs SFV - Morning GloriesLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Singer / Margery Teller vs Mary Coladonato / Simone Friedman4-6, 1-6
2023-07-21vs SFV - Always Causing A RacquetLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesHolly Culhane / Margery Teller vs Leslie Giammanco / Susan Daymude5-7, 5-7
2023-07-14vs SFV - Always Causing A RacquetSplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesMargery Teller / Holly Culhane vs Tracy Kuncar / Karen Watts7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMiki Lorentz / Deborah Singer vs Deidre Hope / Vivian Hill6-2, 7-5
2023-07-07vs SFV LLW - SFVG Double Nickels - Helen McCuskerLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMimi Lin / Miki Lorentz vs Vicki Weinstein / Yolanda Zackler2-6, 2-6
2023-06-21vs SFV - Morning GloriesWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesJanice Miller / Miki Lorentz vs Rhonda Rundle / Gladys Gravelis6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55+ WeekDay - 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Holly Culhane
published 3.5
3.21
Helen Hollien
published 3.5
3.10
Victoria O Seni
published —
3.04
Margery Teller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Friedman
published —
2.87
Connie Benveniste
published 3.5
2.78
Joanne Carlsen
published —
2.76
Miki Lorentz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Deborah Singer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Benveniste + Joanne Carlsen0–518% games−16.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Culhane
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
—
3.5
Helen Hollien
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
—
Victoria O Seni
5W–20L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Margery Teller
81W–87L career · 6 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
—
Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Connie Benveniste
2W–21L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
—
Joanne Carlsen
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Miki Lorentz
84W–98L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Deborah Singer
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.