Teams

Cannon DV

2022 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 7.5 Combo Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-23vs Tonks/YMCA/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMandy Poplin / Yuriko Roten vs Candace Scott / Courtney Haan4-6, 2-6
2022-10-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesYuriko Roten / Chelsea Cannon vs Kelly Walker / Kelly Miller7-6, 7-5
2022-10-03vs LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarie Shuford / Mandy Poplin vs Marsha Diamonti / Sunday Richardson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-26vs Lundberg/YMCA/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMandy Poplin / Marie Shuford vs Weena Gonzalez / Paula Gettys6-2, 6-4
2022-09-19vs Tonks/YMCA/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMandy Poplin / Blythe Parker vs Karen Tonks / Lynne Place6-1, 6-4
2022-09-05vs Erikson/HCP/FoothillsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMandy Poplin / Blythe Parker vs Kimberly Steele / Sarah Wohlbruck7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesChelsea Cannon / Melissa Turbett vs Connie Kleeves / Marian Erikson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCecilia Grasinger / Marie Shuford vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Kelly Miller3-6, 1-6
2022-08-29vs LHCC/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathleen Graham / Marie Shuford vs Allison Holtzman / Jenette Swisher3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChelsea Cannon / Mar Startari-Stegall vs Sunday Richardson / Rosemary Skoog6-2, 7-6
2022-08-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesMandy Poplin / Blythe Parker vs Cheryl Howitt / Jill Griffin6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Blythe Parker
published 4
3.78
Mandy Poplin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Chelsea Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Melissa Turbett
published
3.59
Kathleen Graham
published
3.55
Karen Ginn
published
3.11
Yuriko Roten
published
3.08
Marie Shuford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Shuford + Mandy Poplin2742% games−3.0% vs expected
Chelsea Cannon + Mandy Poplin3744% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Blythe Parker
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
4.12
4
Mandy Poplin
125W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Chelsea Cannon
25W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Melissa Turbett
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Kathleen Graham
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Karen Ginn
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Yuriko Roten
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Marie Shuford
70W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.