Teams

Team 10 This is 40 Love

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-20vs Team 6 MatchPointWon 10
W#3 DoublesGrace Kim / Eve Pandit vs Alison Bouwmeester / Suzanne Swanhorst7-5, 5-2
2024-04-13vs Team 7 String CourtettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesGrace Kim / Eve Pandit vs Asli Dervis / Kristin Satterfield1-6, 0-6
2024-04-10vs Team 22 Love Me NotsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJudy OConnor / Tina Monahan vs Nancy Abramson / Mary Ellen Giuseppe2-6, 2-4
2024-04-07vs Team 12 Over ServedSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAshley Vroman-Lee / Eve Pandit vs Paige Bartlett / Mary Krueger5-7, 5-1
L#3 DoublesGrace Kim / Kristin Kahn vs Livia Chung / Jahki Nielsen4-6, 2-5
2024-04-04vs Team 13 MorrissyLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Vroman-Lee / Eve Pandit vs McKaye Darling / Stephanie Stack4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Kim / Kristin Kahn vs Alison Weiss / Anna McLean5-7, 2-4
2024-03-15vs Team 1 Talk to the BackhandLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin Kahn / Grace Kim vs Maria Costea / Paula Garrison0-6, 5-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Vroman-Lee / Judy OConnor vs Sally Keith / Sheryl Morley1-6, 7-6
2024-03-03vs Team 8 Serve Me A Double 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrace Kim / Eve Pandit vs Valerie Ciccone / Josephine Cooper6-4, 6-1
2024-02-24vs Team 11 Spin SistersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJudy OConnor / Eve Pandit vs Emily Knowles / Karen Schneider6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristin Kahn / Tara Rethore vs Lorena Alfaro / Stephanie Wright4-6, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Eve Pandit
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.45
Judy OConnor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Tiffany Malloy
published
3.04
Kristin Kahn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Hiam Eljazzar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elisa Leak
published
Grace Kim
published
Tara Rethore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy OConnor + Eve Pandit13463% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eve Pandit
136W–75L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Judy OConnor
73W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Tiffany Malloy
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Kristin Kahn
128W–147L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Hiam Eljazzar
69W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91
Elisa Leak
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Grace Kim
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tara Rethore
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.