Teams

SPANISH BAY 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-19vs MONTEREY TC 40MX7.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Klevan / Branislav Kovac vs Sarah Saxby / John Negrey6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Eldridge / George Isaac vs Klara Turner / Corneliu Dane6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesErin High / Brian Chin vs Karen Isaac / Shane Stettenbenz7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Branislav Kovac
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Nicole Truszkowski
published
3.54
Maria Eldridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
George Isaac
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Casey Riddell
published 3.5
3.44
Erin High
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Kim Tope
published
3.36
Nancy P Taylor
published
3.34
Kirstie Wilde
published
3.30
Sylvia Lee
published
3.18
Katie Klevan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Clancy D'Angelo
published 3.5
3.11
Amy Brandt
published 3
3.07
Maureen Webb
published
2.97
Jennifer Stachel
published
2.94
Julie Mccullough
published
2.88
Anila Light
published 3
2.83
Dani Dayton
published 3
Sri Venkat
published
Tony Klevan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Branislav Kovac + Jennifer Stachel4149% gamesnot enough data
Clancy D'Angelo + Kim Tope213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Branislav Kovac
22W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
Nicole Truszkowski
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Maria Eldridge
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
George Isaac
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Casey Riddell
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Erin High
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kim Tope
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Nancy P Taylor
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Kirstie Wilde
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Sylvia Lee
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Katie Klevan
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Clancy D'Angelo
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Amy Brandt
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Maureen Webb
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Stachel
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Julie Mccullough
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Anila Light
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Dani Dayton
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Sri Venkat
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Klevan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.