Teams

RCCB-Rosenquist

2021 Brevard Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-22vs EGYC-LevyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarlos Prado / Melissa Rosenquist vs Denise Stanley / Jason Stanley6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Barto / Shelly Rosseau vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Criste / Marcus Lumpkin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesShelly Rosseau / Vincent Vo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-08vs EGYC-LevyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Landress / Melissa Rosenquist vs Chris Hill / Denise Stanley6-3, 6-2
2021-05-01vs Kiwi- LaurettaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Kevin Landress vs Martin Rojas / Bianca Lauretta6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarlos Prado / Emily Criste vs Sean Kelly / Jennifer Jackson7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2021-04-17vs Brevard - Rockledge / DonovanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeith Barto / Shelly Rosseau vs Donald Small / Naomi Coleman5-7, 4-6
2021-04-10vs Aquarina-AlmeydaWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelly Rosseau / Kevin Landress vs Deborah Phillips / Alexandre de Chabert6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-26vs Kiwi- LaurettaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Kevin Landress vs Bianca Lauretta / John Baldwin6-1, 6-0
2021-03-13vs TTC-PfeilSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Keith Barto vs Phyllis O'Toole / Rob Hindle6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEmily Criste / Carlos Prado vs Arletha White / Thomas Armstrong3-6, 4-6
2021-03-06vs Brevard - Rockledge / DonovanLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarlos Prado / Shelly Rosseau vs Licci Barham / Shawn Coleman2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Amy Gregory
published 4
3.47
Shelly Rosseau
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Lee Harrington
published
3.28
Melissa Rosenquist
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Rob Barham
published
3.17
Vincent Vo
published
3.15
Emily Criste
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Kevin Landress
published
2.96
Marcus Lumpkin
published
Keith Barto
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Gregory
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Shelly Rosseau
96W–74L career · 5 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.47
Lee Harrington
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Melissa Rosenquist
64W–82L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
Rob Barham
12W–8L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Vincent Vo
16W–6L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Criste
81W–155L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Kevin Landress
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.04
Marcus Lumpkin
8W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.96
Keith Barto
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.