Teams

RCazares (Charlotte Tennis NC)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Sun PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-13vs DBrantmeyer (Park Road)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Boston / Don Nelson vs Brian Cudney / George Jackson6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-04-06vs TCastain (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTim Melton / Mike Boston vs Tom Castain / Chad Foster6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Semler / Robert Cazares vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-30vs SDavis (Southampton)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Cazares / Charles Bowers vs Gary Covitz / John Lineberger2-6, 2-6
2025-03-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMario Gonzalez / Claude Underwood vs Sean Fox / Bobby Pifer1-6, 1-6
2025-03-02vs BHofmann/RGum (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRobert Cazares / Claude Underwood vs Louis Mossotti / David Rowland3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMike Boston / Tim Melton vs Joseph Heyward / Jim Malseed4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Sun PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Mike Boston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.15
Mark Semler
published
3.92
Don Nelson
published
3.74
Charles Bowers
published 4
3.72
Tim Melton
published
3.71
Philip Durand
published 4
3.65
Jens Lamba
published
3.63
Tim Scott
published
3.58
Robert Cazares
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Claude Underwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mario Gonzalez
published
Wayne Ernest
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Boston + Tim Melton6074% games+14.3% vs expected
Charles Bowers + Jens Lamba134 matchesnot enough data
Mike Boston + Robert Cazares404 matchesnot enough data
Mike Boston + Mark Semler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mike Boston
76W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
4.18
Mark Semler
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
4.15
Don Nelson
45W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Charles Bowers
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Tim Melton
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Philip Durand
32W–22L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Jens Lamba
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Tim Scott
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Robert Cazares
29W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Claude Underwood
67W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mario Gonzalez
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Ernest
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.