Teams

Morris/55s/3.5/SC Day

2025 Man · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Morris / Deborah Bowie vs Abby Morse / Beth Gonzales7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesDenise Weed / Deborah Bowie vs Grace Gambel / Abby Morse4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 55 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Denise Weed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Berrill Vogt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Carole Dahmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Debbie Morvant
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Deborah Bowie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Donna Mott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Hill
published
Monique Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Sheila Wittie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Parke
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Suzie Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Tessy Ajubita
published
Tiffany Swoboda
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Yvette O'Krepki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Dahmer + Denise Weed033 matchesnot enough data
Tessy Ajubita + Berrill Vogt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Weed
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Berrill Vogt
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3.5
Carole Dahmer
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
3
Debbie Morvant
5W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Deborah Bowie
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Mott
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Hill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Monique Thornton
3W–7L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Wittie
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Parke
4W–27L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzie Lambert
23W–12L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tessy Ajubita
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Swoboda
20W–10L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yvette O'Krepki
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.