Teams

FK - Long

2024 Marion Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-23vs Marion/Ennett/55&OverMXDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Tichacek / Adela Tichacek vs Bruce Smith / Ketty Smith6-0, 6-1
2024-06-09vs Marion/Ennett/55&OverMXDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Tichacek / Adela Tichacek vs Barbara Turner / CARL TURNER6-3, 6-3
2024-06-02vs Winning Warriors (FK - Ryals)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMike Tichacek / Adela Tichacek vs George Ryals / Cindy Hinton6-1, 6-1
2024-04-28vs Marion/Ennett/55&OverMXDWon 10
W#2 DoublesMike Tichacek / Adela Tichacek vs David Charlip / Shelley Ennett6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Judy Hoops
published
3.26
Rebecca Long
published
2.90
Adela Tichacek
published 3
2.88
Michelle Broder
published
2.79
Raksha Ramkissoon
published
Caressa Gray
published 3
2.57
Mike Tichacek
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
2.35
Maryse Whitsett
published
2.06
Denise Ritter
published 2.5
2.04
Donna Schafer
published
George Velez
published
Marius Taricic
published
Olga Mosteller
published
Roger Chak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Tichacek + Adela Tichacek15266% games+23.7% vs expected
George Velez + Carina Gandiongco3256% gamesnot enough data
George Velez + Denise Ritter044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
Rebecca Long
24W–28L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Adela Tichacek
21W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
2.90
Michelle Broder
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Raksha Ramkissoon
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Caressa Gray
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Mike Tichacek
298W–203L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Carina Gandiongco
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.42
Maryse Whitsett
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.35
2.5
Denise Ritter
4W–23L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Donna Schafer
6W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04
George Velez
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marius Taricic
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Olga Mosteller
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Roger Chak
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.