Teams

FK - Walsh

2023 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-10vs Florida/Perkins/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Garrick / Mary Jeanne Walsh vs Linda Jones / Beth Riendeau4-6, 2-6
2023-03-02vs Florida/Perkins/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Kimberly Scudder Thompson vs Linda Brown / Karyn Dolan3-6, 2-6
2023-02-24vs Florida/Perkins/65&Over8.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Jeanne Walsh / Gwenda Ward vs Marcia Plante / Yvonne Schappell6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-02-16vs Florida/Perkins/65&Over8.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesGwenda Ward / Mary Jeanne Walsh vs Linda Brown / Karyn Dolan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Fetzer / Laura Flanagan vs Valerie Elvin / Diane Stablein1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Garrick / Nancy Little vs Erica Migliorati / Patti Hischmann6-3, 6-3
2023-02-02vs Florida/Perkins/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Jeanne Walsh / Gwenda Ward vs Linda Jones / Diane Stablein3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Little / Laura Flanagan vs Barbara Slavin / Beverly Gates2-6, 3-6
2023-01-27vs Florida/Perkins/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Garrick / Kimberly Scudder Thompson vs Marcia Plante / Yvonne Schappell3-6, 0-6
2023-01-19vs Florida/Perkins/65&Over8.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Garrick / Marti Little vs Beth Riendeau / Erica Migliorati4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGwenda Ward / Mary Jeanne Walsh vs Beverly Gates / Joan Rice6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Kay Conway
published
3.47
3.46
Marianne Marcoux
published
3.34
Mary Jeanne Walsh
published
3.28
Laura Flanagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gwenda Ward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jan Cole
published
Linda Lademann
published
Nancy Fetzer
published
Nancy Little
published
Susan Garrick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Flanagan + Susan Garrick3548% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kay Conway
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.70
Kimberly Scudder Thompson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Marianne Marcoux
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mary Jeanne Walsh
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
Laura Flanagan
30W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Gwenda Ward
43W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jan Cole
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Lademann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Fetzer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Little
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Garrick
52W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.