Teams

Burkwood Butterworth

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-15vs WW Ninjas - BakerLost 01
L#3 DoublesLUDINEI PICELLI / Adam Decker vs Kevin Calhoun / Michael Baxter3-6, 2-6
2024-08-20vs Belmont Bond 007Won 10
W#3 DoublesAdam Decker / Joshua Durbin vs Ralph Agpaoa / Holland Gravely3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-18vs 8.5 Captain Morgan's Stand at MACWon 10
W#3 DoublesAdam Decker / Keith Harvey vs Geordie Stewart / James Holland6-2, 7-6
2024-08-10vs ACAC BoschLost 01
L#3 DoublesLUDINEI PICELLI / Joshua Durbin vs Craig Carman / Donald Polifka3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.67
Edward Butterworth
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.26
Kyle Russell
published
4.18
Cary Polk
published 4.5
4.15
Keith Harvey
published
4.08
LUDINEI PICELLI
published
4.05
Joshua Durbin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Adam Decker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jay Blaser
published
Ethan Belote
published
Hatcher Butterworth
published
Ken Lu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Decker + Edward Butterworth5167% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Durbin + Adam Decker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Edward Butterworth
84W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.67
Kyle Russell
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Cary Polk
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
Keith Harvey
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
LUDINEI PICELLI
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
4.08
4
Joshua Durbin
72W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Adam Decker
149W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
Jay Blaser
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Ethan Belote
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Hatcher Butterworth
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ken Lu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.