Teams

X40 7.0 BR Timken

2026 NEOTA Mixed 40 & Over · NEOTA 7.0 40&O Mixed

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-01vs X40 7.0 NC1 BaileyLost 12
L#1 DoublesRamesh Krishnamurthi / Tiffany Ruwadi vs William Burnett / Valerie Johnson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDrew Swallen / Joey Hass vs William Arledge / Ashley Bullach7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNathaniel Brahler / Rachel Brahler vs MICHAEL GIBSON / Michelle Rich6-4, 6-1
2026-04-24vs X40 7.0 PM RhynerLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathaniel Brahler / Rachel Brahler vs Christopher Baranek / Michaelia Cucci0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDan Paulus / Jacqueline Paulus vs Jun Hee Han / Lauren Thomas0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFred Zalenski / Traci Tsai vs Wade Hurley / Alison Baranek2-6, 2-6
2026-04-17vs X40 7.0 LT McKenzieLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Paulus / Jacqueline Paulus vs Vu Nguyen / Clare Stacey5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNathaniel Brahler / Rachel Brahler vs SHENGYONG WANG / Donna Balc7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesFred Zalenski / Joey Hass vs Steven Wood / Alissa McKenzie2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-10vs X40 7.0 LT McKenzieLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Brahler / Ramesh Krishnamurthi vs Clare Stacey / Vu Nguyen2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSara Timken / Nathaniel Brahler vs Leslie Miller / Jeffrey Miller2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoey Hass / Drew Swallen vs Heather Wentz / Chito Lam6-7, 4-6
2026-03-27vs X40 7.0 NC2 WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Timken / Robert Timken vs Clayton Cundiff / Karri Tadayon6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDrew Swallen / Joey Hass vs David Currier / Jeannette Cho7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristin Zalenski / Fred Zalenski vs Shannon Zaher / Tom Webb1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-20vs X40 7.0 TP FoxWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Timken / Sara Timken vs Steve Barker / Susan Voth3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesFred Zalenski / Melissa Lombardi vs William Fox / Michelle Fox6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDrew Swallen / Kim Swallen vs Brian Lambright / Lori Young6-0, 7-5
2026-03-13vs X40 7.0 NC1 BaileyLost 12
W#1 DoublesDrew Swallen / Joey Hass vs Brian Suddeth / Ashley Bullach7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJ Britton Morrow / Francie Morrow vs Douglas Bernard / Stephanie Bailey4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHoward Wernow / Katie Wernow vs MICHAEL GIBSON / Michelle Rich2-6, 3-6
2026-02-27vs X40 7.0 PM RhynerLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Paulus / Dan Paulus vs Christopher Baranek / Michaelia Cucci6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Zalenski / Fred Zalenski vs Alison Baranek / Wade Hurley0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNathaniel Brahler / Rachel Brahler vs Iuliana Nita / Jun Hee Han6-7, 4-6
2026-02-20vs X40 7.0 NC2 WilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesFred Zalenski / Kristin Zalenski vs Tom Webb / Kimberly Williams4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Timken / Sara Timken vs David Currier / Jeannette Cho2-6, 3-6
2026-02-06vs X40 7.0 TP FoxWon 21
L#1 DoublesNathaniel Brahler / Rachel Brahler vs Steve Barker / Christine Norman3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Tsai / Traci Tsai vs William Fox / Michelle Fox6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDan Paulus / Jacqueline Paulus vs Keith Amtsberg / Alice Lewis7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 7.0 40&O Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X40 7.0 NC1 Bailey9123717220
2X40 7.0 MV3 Nguyen802227139
3X40 7.0 LT McKenzie8221921211
4X40 7.0 PM Rhyner64191125231
5X40 7.0 MV2 Gustafson53131127214
6X40 7.0 NC2 Williams55141637287
7X40 7.0 MV1 Drenovsky44131126225
8X40 7.0 MM Ghosh2671735235
9X40 7.0 BR Timken2892143311
10X40 7.0 WR Downing1751939260
11X40 7.0 TP Fox01042653338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Dan Paulus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Melissa Lombardi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Nathaniel Brahler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Ramesh Krishnamurthi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Kim Swallen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Drew Swallen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
David Tsai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Francie Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Fred Zalenski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Robert Timken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Sara Timken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Joey Hass
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Traci Tsai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Katie Wernow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Kristin Zalenski
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Howard Wernow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Rachel Brahler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Tiffany Ruwadi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Jacqueline Paulus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
J Britton Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathaniel Brahler + Rachel Brahler51044% games+3.3% vs expected
Fred Zalenski + Kristin Zalenski41141% games−10.7% vs expected
Sara Timken + Robert Timken1739% gamesnot enough data
Dan Paulus + Jacqueline Paulus134 matchesnot enough data
Sara Timken + Drew Swallen134 matchesnot enough data
David Tsai + Traci Tsai134 matchesnot enough data
Joey Hass + Drew Swallen224 matchesnot enough data
Sara Timken + Ramesh Krishnamurthi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Paulus
44W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Melissa Lombardi
47W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Nathaniel Brahler
36W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Ramesh Krishnamurthi
25W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.25
Kim Swallen
29W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Drew Swallen
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
David Tsai
56W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Francie Morrow
137W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.10
Fred Zalenski
19W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Robert Timken
29W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Sara Timken
135W–131L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Joey Hass
66W–85L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.86
Traci Tsai
110W–116L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.82
Katie Wernow
33W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Kristin Zalenski
63W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
Howard Wernow
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.74
Rachel Brahler
46W–70L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Tiffany Ruwadi
44W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
Jacqueline Paulus
25W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
J Britton Morrow
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.