Teams

GJTC NSNIDER

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - WS

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-18vs GJTC WSMITHWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Reams / Natalie Shpigel vs Suzy Keith / Jennifer Bradfield4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-09vs GJTC WGECHTERLost 01
L#2 DoublesNatasha Snider / Megan Riveros vs Christina Fitzrandolph / Tammy Kinnes4-6, 3-6
2024-08-26vs GJTC LHILLANSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNatasha Snider / Natalie Shpigel vs Leia Hillan / Vanessa Young3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Riveros vs Celeste Quarnberg6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-19vs GJTC SHURTSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Reams / Natalie Shpigel vs Maggie Coleman / Diana Beehler7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNatasha Snider / Megan Riveros vs Shelly Hurt / Tammy Bishop3-6, 2-6
2024-08-12vs GJTC LSANDERSWon 10
W#1 SinglesMegan Riveros vs Merrill Hunt7-5, 6-4
2024-07-29vs GJTC SMABLEYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMegan Riveros / Natasha Snider vs Kim Murray / Missy DeRose1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Shpigel / Sophia Knaysi vs Stephanie Mabley / Amy Urbach6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Megan Riveros
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Jerrilyn Palmer
published
2.96
Natalie Shpigel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Sophia Knaysi
published
2.76
Melissa Reams
published
Natasha Snider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Reams + Sophia Knaysi404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Megan Riveros
49W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Jerrilyn Palmer
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.02
3
Natalie Shpigel
45W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
2.96
Sophia Knaysi
29W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
2.96
Melissa Reams
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
Natasha Snider
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.