Teams

WASHINGTON PK 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Marie Huxley
published
3.43
Ada Palotai
published 3.5
3.29
Christine Kizziah
published 3.5
3.28
Kay Kolos McCubbin
published
3.28
Amelia Spinrad
published 3
3.25
Sarah McElhinney
published
3.24
Mary Anderson
published
3.23
Stephanie Huang
published
3.21
Anna DeRoos
published 3.5
3.21
3.20
Nicole Nguyen
published
3.11
Jana Chabre
published
3.03
Kathleen Shrader
published
2.91
Jann King
published
2.88
Taylor Page
published
2.86
Danoh Nibler
published 3
2.83
2.83
Serena Zanello
published
2.71
Audrey Irwin
published 3
Tyler Martz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ada Palotai + Christine Kizziah4261% games+5.6% vs expected
Catharina Koh-Mollet + Christine Kizziah044 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Nguyen + Catharina Koh-Mollet303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marie Huxley
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Ada Palotai
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Christine Kizziah
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Kay Kolos McCubbin
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Amelia Spinrad
28W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Sarah McElhinney
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Mary Anderson
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Stephanie Huang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Anna DeRoos
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jessica Pfannenstiel
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Nicole Nguyen
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Jana Chabre
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Kathleen Shrader
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jann King
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
Taylor Page
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Danoh Nibler
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Catharina Koh-Mollet
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Serena Zanello
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Audrey Irwin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Tyler Martz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.